Believe whatever you want but what you think regarding this issue doesn't matter. Being dismissive of someone based on one's number of posts is dumb as if the one and only arbiter is whether you can prove anything based on your finheaven post history. As if nothing outside this website matters. Some restraint on your part would've been wise. Think about it: If I lied to make myself look good, why did I simultaneously and freely admit the ones I missed? Don't you think that if I made it all up that Wilson, the best one out of 2012, would've been a part of my supposedly fabricated story to make myself look even better? Yet instead, I freely admitted that I was dismissive of him. And if I was the type to state the obvious only once the dust settled, why did I take a bold stance on Haskins, Stick, and Stidham in this thread, and Lock in another? If what I said is true, you have no argument.
You're a Tannehill fan. You were wrong everyday for seven years about Tannehill. What sort of content did you provide regarding the qb position?
The fact you went through some trouble researching my old posts is somewhat commendable. Did you come across the one where I tried to dismantle the idea that Tannehill was close to elite by showing it really wasn't that special as around 18 other qbs had better stretches? It's time to update that now but I can't be bothered. Mahomes, Trubisky, Watson, and I believe Mayfield would like to join the elite party with pacifiers.