DolfinJohnNY
Active Roster
Are we discussing the same guy that has been littering our depth chart the last few years?Some people just don't know talent
Can't be...
Are we discussing the same guy that has been littering our depth chart the last few years?Some people just don't know talent
Physical attributes does not equal talent.Are we discussing the same guy that has been littering our depth chart the last few years?
Can't be...
How could Parker possibly have any trade value? Maybe two years ago, but not now.Does anyone here really believe that guys like amendola and parker actually have trade value? I think some of you are reaching to be honest.
Parker clearly had talent, that is obvious. For me, it ended up being about his health. When he could stay healthy for a stretch of time he was fulfilling his promise and looked like a very good WR. But he never even put together a single healthy season, and as he ages those injuries are going to really pile up. The talent is there. But new coaches nuke the roster and start over, they're all about throwing the baby out with the bath water. I can't see any way that Flores keeps a guy with Parker's injury history.We don't want that. Parker is still young. Clearly he didn't meet expectations as a #1 and "the next AJ Green" but he has showed he belongs in the league and will only improve.
- Stephen Ross“As I said, I think that we’re going in a direction of building something and looking to build an organization that can be sustainable in winning, not just signing a few free agents that are older with a few draft choices and think you’re going to be a contender.”
http://www.espn.com/blog/nflnation/...deal-can-danny-amendola-expect-in-free-agencyMarket watch: Viewing Amendola as purely slot receiver, a player like the Dallas Cowboys wideout Cole Beasley could be in the conversation as a comparable player. Beasley signed a four-year, $13.6 million deal in 2015. Beasley is going to be 29 in April, so the age factor means it isn't an apples-to-apples situation with the 32-year-old Amendola. But with Amendola likely looking at a one-year deal, a pact that could total $3.4 million in maximum value (which is the per-year average of Beasley's deal) wouldn't be out of line with the current market. There really isn't another pure 30-year-old slot receiver in the NFL, in a similar system to the Patriots, that helps shape a clear-cut market for Amendola (49.9 percent of the offensive snaps in 2017). Washington's Jamison Crowder, who enters the final year of his rookie deal in 2018, is another shifty slot receiver (66 catches last season) and he's due to make $1.9 million in base salary this season. That number figures to grow in his second NFL contract.
Talent? Really? Just out of curiosity, to whom do you refer?
I like Grant as a returner / spot receiver, but he's too small.
Wilson us a bit bigger, but nor much.
Physical attributes does not equal talent.
Parker has not lived up to expectations, as a #1 pick, but he's not horrible. He may, or may not be a better fit in a different offense.
The biggest issue with him, IMO, is his propensity for injury. That, in itself is reason to move on.
It doesn't matter if you only pay a fraction of what he's due, if he only plays in 6 games a year.
See what the Chiefs are doing with a bunch of little guys?
Wilson looked great as an all purpose type that could line up all over the field and constantly be in motion. I think every coordinator wants someone like him and fits right into that Pats model of hunting down and targeting the mismatch.
Even when he was available, if he was anything less than 100% his play was affectedOnes biggest ability, is availability.
Also Parker has been such a disappointment, how anyone could advocate keeping him is just nuts at this point.
Even when he was available, if he was anything less than 100% his play was affected
I suppose if the price were right, you might consider keeping him, if Flores thought he could do something with him, but it's probably best for both parties, especially DP, that they part company.Ones biggest ability, is availability.
Also Parker has been such a disappointment, how anyone could advocate keeping him is just nuts at this point.
Parker clearly had talent, that is obvious. For me, it ended up being about his health. When he could stay healthy for a stretch of time he was fulfilling his promise and looked like a very good WR. But he never even put together a single healthy season, and as he ages those injuries are going to really pile up. The talent is there. But new coaches nuke the roster and start over, they're all about throwing the baby out with the bath water. I can't see any way that Flores keeps a guy with Parker's injury history.
I wish him the best, and I gotta say I like the person, but the player just wasn't consistently healthy enough to re-sign for a new head coach.