I would take Parsons in a heartbeat and stick him in there all 4 downs.You have to admit that Parsons and Van Ginkle, lining up at that large-OLB position would be quite the pair. Probably both of them on the field on third downs... it'd be fun.
I would take Parsons in a heartbeat and stick him in there all 4 downs.You have to admit that Parsons and Van Ginkle, lining up at that large-OLB position would be quite the pair. Probably both of them on the field on third downs... it'd be fun.
He's not the edge rusher we apparently need..I would take Parsons in a heartbeat and stick him in there all 4 downs.
lol.He's not the edge rusher we apparently need..
Well Pitts is more of a need than Parsons...Sewell is a bust!lol.
neither is Penei Sewell or Kyle Pitts!
I'm mostly in agreement on Parsons, I can see there would be a lot of places we could use him depending on down and distance. I've been beating the drums for 2 high picks to be used on our front seven, and a fierce, crazy presence like Parsons would really help.I would take Parsons in a heartbeat and stick him in there all 4 downs.
I know! so was i!BTW I was being sarcastic...
Never forget.
That was the type of play that made people here feel he was better than what he was. I'm ok with him being back but he missed more plays than he made.Was he just highlighted with a baby bottle. Lol, thats fantastic