Dolphins Will Honor Late Nick Buoniconti With Helmet Decal | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Dolphins Will Honor Late Nick Buoniconti With Helmet Decal

DKphin

Active Roster
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
14,535
Reaction score
6,353
Location
Pattaya, Thailand
p35fini1k9ubfhpzolj8


The Dolphins will honor the memory of the late Nick Buoniconti during the 2019 season with a special decal on their helmets.

The decal will feature the initials “NAB” and be worn for the first time in the regular season opener against the Baltimore Ravens at Hard Rock Stadium on Sept. 8.

https://www.miamidolphins.com/news/dolphins-will-honor-late-nick-buoniconti-with-helmet-decal
 
Probably because the number wasn't retired.

Does his number deserved to be retired? I was too young at the time he played so I don’t know or can’t have an opinion. I became a fan in 79 so I understand the history and all but didn’t see Nick play.

You could argue that I should look at the stats but football was not built that way. You can do that with baseball because it’s stat driven.

Was Nick himself a legendary player? Or was he just a very good player who benefitted from playing on a great team? And what I mean is legendary on the field, not taking his off the field work into account.

I’m a fan of retiring numbers IF the player was a legendary player like Babe Ruth, Joe DiMaggio, Willie Mays, Lawrence Taylor or in our case Dan Marino. I hate when teams start retiring numbers at will just so they can kick start their own history. I feel the same way about the Hall of Fames. Too many very good players make it into the Hall, I think you need to be a legendary player. If you have to think about a player whether he is worthy or not then I think No.

So I’m curious, do you guys who are old enough consider Nick a legendary player on the field? I was always curious about this question as I am curious about other players who played on those early Dolphin years.
 
Does his number deserved to be retired? I was too young at the time he played so I don’t know or can’t have an opinion. I became a fan in 79 so I understand the history and all but didn’t see Nick play.

You could argue that I should look at the stats but football was not built that way. You can do that with baseball because it’s stat driven.

Was Nick himself a legendary player? Or was he just a very good player who benefitted from playing on a great team? And what I mean is legendary on the field, not taking his off the field work into account.

I’m a fan of retiring numbers IF the player was a legendary player like Babe Ruth, Joe DiMaggio, Willie Mays, Lawrence Taylor or in our case Dan Marino. I hate when teams start retiring numbers at will just so they can kick start their own history. I feel the same way about the Hall of Fames. Too many very good players make it into the Hall, I think you need to be a legendary player. If you have to think about a player whether he is worthy or not then I think No.

So I’m curious, do you guys who are old enough consider Nick a legendary player on the field? I was always curious about this question as I am curious about other players who played on those early Dolphin years.
Easy, see my reply in post #7.

I also agree with you regarding the Hall of Fames of many sports. They include a lot of "very good" players. No I'm not going to name names. Also, in baseball the fact that MARIANO RIVERA is the only unanimous selection is ridiculous! He's deserving, oh yeah but BABE Freakin' RUTH, JACKIE ROBINSON, CY YOUNG, CHRISTIE MATTHISON (sp?), CAL RIPKIN, DEREK JETER...?
 
I can't agree with that. He's in the ring of honor. Retired numbers should be for the absolute cream of the crop. Retire his number then others should be retired also.

We can respectfully, agree to disagree DF. IMO, that GOAT '72 team, was captained by the cream of the crop. 85 was all that & a bag of chips. Just wondering if you're old enough to remember 85 during his playing days because he was VERY SPECIAL. JMO of course.
 
A fitting gesture by the team having the decal all season. Not sure where I stand on having #85 retired tho.
 
Does his number deserved to be retired? I was too young at the time he played so I don’t know or can’t have an opinion. I became a fan in 79 so I understand the history and all but didn’t see Nick play.

You could argue that I should look at the stats but football was not built that way. You can do that with baseball because it’s stat driven.

Was Nick himself a legendary player? Or was he just a very good player who benefitted from playing on a great team? And what I mean is legendary on the field, not taking his off the field work into account.

I’m a fan of retiring numbers IF the player was a legendary player like Babe Ruth, Joe DiMaggio, Willie Mays, Lawrence Taylor or in our case Dan Marino. I hate when teams start retiring numbers at will just so they can kick start their own history. I feel the same way about the Hall of Fames. Too many very good players make it into the Hall, I think you need to be a legendary player. If you have to think about a player whether he is worthy or not then I think No.

So I’m curious, do you guys who are old enough consider Nick a legendary player on the field? I was always curious about this question as I am curious about other players who played on those early Dolphin years.
It’s tough because he played on two teams and was great for both. Pre Probowl era + pro bowl era he was an 8x all star / all pro. 32 career INTs for a MLB is pretty awesome.
 
It’s tough because he played on two teams and was great for both. Pre Probowl era + pro bowl era he was an 8x all star / all pro. 32 career INTs for a MLB is pretty awesome.
Absolutely right on the INTs.
Ive heard people say he didn't get many sacks, which is true; BUT in that defense he wasn't asked to blitz the passer very often. He was more of a read and react, sideline to sideline player and was always around the football.
 
I can't agree with that. He's in the ring of honor. Retired numbers should be for the absolute cream of the crop. Retire his number then others should be retired also.

I was around for those days and am not easily persuaded for retiring numbers, but #85 should be...not only was Nick a Hall of Fame player, he was the captain and leader of a historically accomplished defensive squad that won two championships.
 
Back
Top Bottom