JayFin327 Active Roster Joined Apr 9, 2007 Messages 567 Reaction score 391 Location Winterfell Nov 12, 2015 #2 lol besides us....they were way off with the Lions too
T Tannenbombs Club Member Joined Aug 19, 2014 Messages 2,182 Reaction score 131 Nov 12, 2015 #3 You mean some guys analytics who has never watched a game of football projected us to go to the Super Bowl?
You mean some guys analytics who has never watched a game of football projected us to go to the Super Bowl?
B BGtoKNfor6 Where is the reset button? Joined Jul 9, 2006 Messages 3,890 Reaction score 20 Age 46 Location illinois Nov 12, 2015 #4 Well if we didn't run the defense of the OP, we may actually closer to that prediction....
royalshank Not a Game-Changer Super Donator Club Member Joined Mar 13, 2006 Messages 28,010 Reaction score 38,285 Location New Jersey Nov 12, 2015 #5 These Harvard kids need to hit the books a bit harder, work on winning their 1:1 battles.
D0lphan72 4/23/2020 Club Member Joined Dec 10, 2009 Messages 3,886 Reaction score 893 Location Earth Nov 12, 2015 #6 LOL @ Raiders at 1%
A Awsi Dooger Super Donator Club Member Joined Feb 8, 2005 Messages 10,899 Reaction score 7,020 Location Las Vegas Nov 12, 2015 #7 Lots to pick on. But notice how low they were with the Ravens. That's easily the bright spot for them.
Lots to pick on. But notice how low they were with the Ravens. That's easily the bright spot for them.
dlockz Hall Of Famer Joined Sep 6, 2004 Messages 52,028 Reaction score 3,954 Age 58 Location Tampa Fl Nov 13, 2015 #8 olivadotti said: Click to expand... Yea thats why I dont bet football with the harvard method lol
Tannchise ☠️ Banned ☠️ Joined Oct 16, 2012 Messages 3,842 Reaction score 498 Location S Florida Nov 13, 2015 #9 this would be true if teams were not allowed to run the ball