JTech194
Starter
Can someone explain this draft value concept to me. For example, I've heard most people say DGB has top 10 talent, but his off the field issues make him a reach at 14... so he'd be more of a 20-25th pick in the first round. How does that work? So teams shouldn't risk a #14 first round pick on him due to the off field issues but it's ok to risk the #20th pick on him??? How is that math done? Dez Bryant dropped because of this Risk value concept and so did Randy Moss but I don't know one person knowing what we know now wouldn't take the risk and draft them top 10.
This isn't a draft DGB thread, that's not the point here. My point is, if there's a guy with top 10 talent ON THE FIELD, you take him, and if you have to assign a 24 hour security detail on him to ensure he stays out of trouble... so be it. Especially when there's not another option with similar talent available to you when you pick.
For example if you think DBG (or any other player) is lets say the 2nd best WR in the draft (with Dez Bryant type upside), and your 1st and 3rd rated WR's were off the board... and your 4th rated WR is on the board and you have him with lets say Greg Jennings type upside... who do you take? A possible Greg Jennings OR a possible Dez Bryant?
This isn't a draft DGB thread, that's not the point here. My point is, if there's a guy with top 10 talent ON THE FIELD, you take him, and if you have to assign a 24 hour security detail on him to ensure he stays out of trouble... so be it. Especially when there's not another option with similar talent available to you when you pick.
For example if you think DBG (or any other player) is lets say the 2nd best WR in the draft (with Dez Bryant type upside), and your 1st and 3rd rated WR's were off the board... and your 4th rated WR is on the board and you have him with lets say Greg Jennings type upside... who do you take? A possible Greg Jennings OR a possible Dez Bryant?