I know we didnt get Brooks but did we go for anyone else?
Are we trying to get anyone as an UDFA?
Are we trying to get anyone as an UDFA?
where did you here that from?diego's fins said:now we're looking at dixon and berriman but the only news I've heard is that dixon may sign with the 49ers as early as today, so that leaves us berriman who I like better than dixon because he's more versatile and more natural at rushing the passer. we'll see
diego's fins said:now we're looking at dixon and berriman but the only news I've heard is that dixon may sign with the 49ers as early as today, so that leaves us berriman who I like better than dixon because he's more versatile and more natural at rushing the passer. we'll see
Bowl_Bound said:I thing the exact opposite. Dixon is a phenom physically.
i'm saying where did you here that we were looking at them?diego's fins said:from kffl.com
49ers | Team may land D. Dixon
Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:28:29 -0700
John Murphy, of Yahoo Sports, reports the <A href="http://www.kffl.com/team/32/nfl">San Francisco 49ers are interested in signing free agent LB David Dixon, according to his agent Frank Murtha. Dixon went undrafted in the supplemental draft July 13. Dixon is expected to sign with the 49ers.
here's the link:
http://www.kffl.com/hotw/
Alex44 said:Thats what we were led to believe untill his pro day.....
Rumor- 6'2 245 runs a 4.4 jumps a 40 inch vertical
Truth at his pro day- just under 6 foot, runs a 4.78 im not sure about the vertical leap
diego's fins said:now we're looking at dixon and berriman but the only news I've heard is that dixon may sign with the 49ers as early as today, so that leaves us berriman who I like better than dixon because he's more versatile and more natural at rushing the passer. we'll see