mysterj1
Practice Squad
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 54
- Reaction score
- 0
As a personnel guy this would be one of my primary focuses, finding as many weapons to slog the offense through the red zone mud as I can. That goes for OLs, RBs, TEs, even QBs. The way the NFL is evolving, teams that have well coached offenses are finding it easier than ever to move the ball between the 20's and get into scoring range, but it's the teams that can keep moving that ball through the red zone and punch it into the end zone that are differentiating themselves from the rest of the league.
I actually LIKE Tony Sparano's idea up in New York to make Tim Tebow essentially a red zone QB/RB. I would consider signing Plaxico Burress if I thought it would earn me some red zone real estate. I would look at tailbacks that are particularly good in the the tight spaces seen in the tight red area (e.g. Jonas Gray, NOT Daniel Thomas). I would look at quarterbacks that have an unusual efficiency near the goal line (e.g. Ryan Tannehill and David Garrard, NOT Matt Moore).
0 to 10 Yard Line Touchdowns, Attempts, Efficiency
Daniel Thomas 2011: 0 TD, 10 ATT (00.0%)
Legedu Naanee 2011: 0 TD, 6 ATT (00.0%)
Brian Hartline 2011: 0 TD, 5 ATT (00.0%)
Chad Johnson 2011: 0 TD, 0 ATT (00.0%)
Davone Bess 2011: 1 TD, 6 ATT (16.7%)*
Lamar Miller 2011: 2 TD, 10 ATT (20.0%)
B.J. Cunningham 2011: 2 TD, 9 ATT (22.2%)
Reggie Bush 2011: 4 TD, 15 ATT (26.7%)**
Matt Moore 2011: 10 TD, 36 ATT (27.8%)
Rishard Matthews 2011: 3 TD, 9 ATT (33.3%)
Steve Slaton 2011: 1 TD, 3 ATT (33.3%)
Anthony Fasano 2011: 2 TD, 5 ATT (40.0%)
Michael Egnew 2011: 2 TD, 5 ATT (40.0%)***
Jeff Fuller 2011: 3 TD, 6 ATT (50.0%)
David Garrard 2010: 12 TD, 23 ATT (52.2%)
Ryan Tannehill 2011: 15 TD, 28 ATT (53.6%)
Charles Clay 2011: 2 TD, 3 ATT (66.7%)
Jonas Gray 2011: 9 TD, 12 ATT (75.0%)
*Note: Davone's numbers include 1 ATT that was a run.
**Note: Reggie's numbers include 1 TD and 4 ATT that were pass targets.
***Note: Michael's numbers include 1 ATT that was a run.
Great info. Thanks for the information.