dolphinheel
Active Roster
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2004
- Messages
- 5,792
- Reaction score
- 8,085
I think that’s everyones sentiment-don’t F it up Grier!We will hopefully select 4 good players
I think that’s everyones sentiment-don’t F it up Grier!We will hopefully select 4 good players
I can supply the photos...Maybe you should start a “he smokes weed thread” on the prospects you like. Worked pretty well for Tunsil and Marino. LOL
Can you please do photoshops on Pitts and Parsons please? The Weed Narrative has benefited the MD more than any other story, except maybe Ricky. LolI can supply the photos...
Ummm..yes! Someone do it!Can you please do photoshops on Pitts and Parsons please? The Weed Narrative has benefited the MD more than any other story, except maybe Ricky. Lol
Great take!yeah i came to a self realization like this myself driving to the grocery store yesterday morning. If Mike G can gain a slight improvement in inline blocking in the offseason, and Pitts can hold his own, its not as much of a matchup nightmare as it would be a scheme nightmare. If you have DVP and Fuller outside, and you have 2 TE's that can double as big WR's, then you really cant focus on D what your sub packages are going to be. do you take DVP, Full, Pitts, MG and line up in shotgun or hell you can line up and show 2 Tight to one side or a balanced line with both MG and Pitt with their hand in the dirt with Tua under center. It took me awhile to come around, but i think we can do more scheme wise adding Pitts to the team as opposed to adding a WR with first pick. Hell if the line can hold the block for 2 seconds, i would love to see our 2nd round RB be a pass catcher and have some empty backfields with the above4 and RB
I'd totally down with this!6. Pitts
18. Parsons (I have a feeling he'll fall)
36. Elijah Moore
50. Alex Leatherwood
Flo seems to like versatility on the Offensive Line. While Leatherwood is projected to be better at guard, I think the prospect of him and Hunt battling it out for the RT spot with the loser kicking inside to guard is appealing. I also think we bypass a Center in the first 3 rounds, and focus on a RB in round 3.
Those top 5 picks would also be goodTraded pick 6 to Carolina for picks 8 and 73.....
Traded pick 36 and the 2022 3rd from SF to move up to 28...
View attachment 73110
Here is the rest of my mock. Had to add 3rd attachment to get my last pick, but marked out picks from previous.
View attachment 73111View attachment 73115
Micah shouldn't be there at 28-32 baring some major development..but dang...I rather like it!6: Pitts
18-32: trade back (Micah, owusu, paye, zavin, harris, 28-32)
36: Harris, Javonte, Etienne or Bateman
50: Leatherwood
It says dream... *shrugs*You think Smith is gonna fall to 18? That would be amazing, but highly unlikely and I don’t want to trade up.
Maybe we should start some Chris Foerster-esque videos for some of the other scenarios on the board.Maybe you should start a “he smokes weed thread” on the prospects you like. Worked pretty well for Tunsil and Marino. LOL