I think that MOST of the Finheaven brothers are on the same page this year-- despite some of the nastier arguments.
We all pretty much agree that we need Offensive and Defensive Linemen more than anything else... then we generally agree that we need defensive backs and the odd offensive weapon player (but most don't want this player drafted early).
Our discussions have mostly been just shadings rather than technicolor differences.
So, we've gotten more locked up on this or that Lineman, or whether we should go OL, DL, CB... or instead DL, OL, CB.
I guess that I'm sort of disappointed. How the heck will we be able to say, "nyah, nyah, nyah, I told you so!" when we are so closely aligned.
I suppose that we can wait for a draft day curveball, but this looks like the easiest draft to predict in many years.
We all pretty much agree that we need Offensive and Defensive Linemen more than anything else... then we generally agree that we need defensive backs and the odd offensive weapon player (but most don't want this player drafted early).
Our discussions have mostly been just shadings rather than technicolor differences.
So, we've gotten more locked up on this or that Lineman, or whether we should go OL, DL, CB... or instead DL, OL, CB.
I guess that I'm sort of disappointed. How the heck will we be able to say, "nyah, nyah, nyah, I told you so!" when we are so closely aligned.
I suppose that we can wait for a draft day curveball, but this looks like the easiest draft to predict in many years.