I think a lot of that was conservative play calling in the early stages of the game. Usually Gase liked to get the ball to Landry because he played with passion and got the team fired up. That’s a lack of on field leadership if you need to do that to get your offense engaged. Teams knew they were looking to Landry early and the offense sputtered until they got behind and were forced to open it up more. Same pattern nearly every game. Who knows what this year will bring!?Would just like to see more early scores from Gase. Hopefully the new additions will improve on first quarter scoring.
Wouldn't it be something if Wilson's production ends up outperforming Landry's?I have a feeling Landry’s numbers are about to drop through the floor.
We have both in one package. Ask AJ.I agree with your opinion regarding Gases coaching strength schematically its the entire head coaching package that is a concern. Do we have a really good head coach or a really good offensive coordinator who happens to be the head coach.
Wouldn't it be something if Wilson's production ends up outperforming Landry's?
After all, the perspective of time has shown that it was Tannehill who got Hartline, Bess and Clay paid, does it not?
I've always felt as though Landry wasn't the type of player you should be trying to force feed the ball and run your offense through. He'd be best served and would make bigger plays being the 2nd or 3rd option with opposing defenses not being able to focus on him. 100+ catches with under 1,000 yards and no td's over 10 yards is hard to do... Idk for sure but I can't imagine that's ever happened before. The thing is... it didn't really work either. I think we can all agree Landry is a really good player, but I think our offense is really going to take off without him provided we ditch the 20+ passes per game within 5 yards of the LOS strategy.I have a feeling Landry’s numbers are about to drop through the floor.
I just realized out of Landry, Hartline, Bess and Clay.. 3 of the 4 ended up in Cleveland and 2 of them basically had zero career after.Wouldn't it be something if Wilson's production ends up outperforming Landry's?
After all, the perspective of time has shown that it was Tannehill who got Hartline, Bess and Clay paid, does it not?
Well, I'm totally fine that we moved on from Landry and I give lots of credit to Gase for getting Landry open but I also like to be fair. Landry still had to catch the passes and get in the end zone. I agree that our offense should be better from now on with more balance but Landry's gone so we should just let it go and focus on the players that we have now and root for them to do well.
provided we ditch the 20+ passes per game within 5 yards of the LOS strategy
I’m very curious to see if the WR screens will actually be successful with Wilson. That’s definitely one of his strengths.