Just read an article that Leatherwood is the most disappointing. Was thought of as plug and play, but is not. I haven't seen him in TC but it's interesting how all the GMs on here think they can build the perfect oline themselves....in no time.
Haha, I guess it can be seen that way.
For me, I am not a coach, nor professional athlete. So all my posts are simply opinion mostly.
For me it's about what makes sense to me. The Same may not make sense for others, but I don't think for others lol.
If Jackson winds up a bust. I won't be upset. He was a LT who many claimed was the best left when we selected. That pick made sense. Regardless how it turns out.
Hunt- played guard. He, imo was a great pick. However, we played him at tackle. Didn't make sense to me, but by the end of the season it worked.
After a successful season at Tackle we move him back to Guard. Starting to not make sense again only because of his success at RT.
WE now need a RT. WE draft a LT in Eichenberg. We don't draft a true RT. Ok, many say he is a pug and play RT, let's go with it.
Then we take our LT, who is supposed to be our RT and primarily play him at LG.
But we have Kindley? SO does that now mean LG was an issue?
It appears we are playing musical chairs rather then developing them at their natural position.
If thats the case why not try Eichenberg at LT and move Jackson to RT?
It's not that I think I know more or believe I can do better. It just doesn't make sense.
Then I am supposed to be surprised a line is struggling when some are playing out of their normal position?
It's tough. I trust FLO. I'm excited about the team. It's just the O line issues don't make sense to me.
But I have been told I need to wait till week 4 or 5 of regular season to be concerned.
Ok I will. I will wait and see and trust.
However, to me, it just seems like this is an obvious issue that won't be fixed in 8 weeka