Grading the ‘Grading the Julius Thomas trade’ article on SB Nation | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Grading the ‘Grading the Julius Thomas trade’ article on SB Nation

DKphin

Active Roster
Joined
Aug 10, 2008
Messages
14,535
Reaction score
6,353
Location
Pattaya, Thailand
499188860.0.jpg

Photo by Sam Greenwood/Getty Images

SB Nation is our parent, and, obviously, they do a lot of great things to allow us as Miami Dolphins fans to have this site and discuss our favorite team throughout the year. That does not mean they are always right, however, and that is the case of Ryan Van Bibber’s recent article “Grading the Julius Thomas and potentially Branden Albert trade.” When the tag line for the article is “Today’s splashy move is tomorrow’s disappointment, at least that’s the way it usually works for the Dolphins. Is this one different?” you know things are not going to go well in the article, but Van Bibber’s conclusions are just wrong.
As a big part of his article, RVB focuses on the (presumed to be finalized) trade of Dolphins starting left tackle Branden Albert to the Jaguars. He writes, ”Albert is due more than $18 million in salary over the next two years, with a cap hit of $10.6 million this year and $11.3 million next year. As we’ve said before, that’s a lot of money for a left tackle who can’t stay on the field for 16 games.”
In the linked article, RVB wrote, “From a financial standpoint, parting ways with the 32-year-old Albert makes sense. He’s got a $10.6 million cap hit this year and an $11.3 million hit next year. That’s a big commitment for a player who hasn’t played a 16-game season since 2011.” He goes on to point out that the Dolphins’ offensive line - when healthy - was good in 2016, especially with the three 200-yard performances from running back Jay Ajayi.
Miami, however, has their new franchise left tackle to take over for Albert in the shape of 2016 first-round draft pick Laremy Tunsil. He is a player who allowed one sack last season while splitting time at left guard and left tackle - where he was filling in for the injured Albert. So, as RVB seems to indicate, trading Albert makes sense financially, especially when you add in the missed games, where Miami was having to rearrange the starting offensive line multiple times during the season.
Then, suddenly, RVB adds into the original “grading” article, “The Jaguars would definitely be getting the better deal here. Albert’s 32 and hasn’t played a full season since 2011, but when he is on the field, he’s a good left tackle, something the Jaguars desperately need, especially if Doug Marrone’s administration is going to take one last chance at salvaging Blake Bortles.”
He follows that up with, “Thomas is more of a luxury for the Dolphins. We’ll see if he agrees to a new contract and what kind of pay cut that carries, if any, but it’s hard to make a case that Thomas makes Miami a better team (especially since they’re going to have to overhaul their defense this offseason and fix up the offensive line with a need at both guard positions now).”
http://www.thephinsider.com/2017/2/...hins-jaguars-grading-the-trade-branden-albert
 
Seem like an over-reaction to the original article.

Time will tell who gets the better of the deal, but hey, the way I see it, we were gonna cut Albert a week ago, now we can actually get something for him.

Win for the Fins in my book.
 
The best content you get on the Fins is either here or on twitter w/ a guy like Max Himmelrich. Most of these SB nation/BR/PFT article are weaksauce.

It does seem like the SB Nation writer forgot what "splash moves" are. Julius a notable name coming in on a restructured deal, and coming off bad seasons. Splash moves are throwing money at a top free agent, regardless of scheme fit or prospects, just to tie a popular name to your franchise.

Ironically, Branden Albert was a splash move for Miami that worked out well. This idiot doesn't even realize that while he's dogging Miami's "splash moves" that went poorly :lol:
 
I no longer read outside articles by writers who don't cover the team. They just don't know.
A 7th for Thomas? At what seems to be 3million? Who in the draft in the 7th round is going to make the impact Thomas could potentially make. If it's a flop, The team is out a 7th that probably would have netted a practice squad player.
And the guy claims that the Jags got the better deal then points out how little Albert played. At LEFT TACKLE. Yeah, Thomas is a luxury piece. If he misses time, you're not missing your LEFT TACKLE.
 
It makes their TE unit better, especially if Sims returns. What the needs are on defense and on the OL has nothing to do with Thomas.
 
SB nation is just finheaven posters with an ego.
 
once i read that julius thomas is taking a pay cut and working on an incentive based contract....the trade started to make a whole lot of sense

this is going to lead to an improved dolphins roster in 2017 - tunsil at LT and Thomas making plays from TE

it will be worth it even if he only plays 12 games
 
The SI writer omitted the important "Adam Gase factor" which provides several tangible benefits arguing that Thomas for a 7th is worth the "risk."

1) Thomas has actually excelled under his influence - and at 28, it's not like he's exactly over-the-hill!
2) Thomas knows his system and will be immediately "plug and play"
3) Players including Thomas, especially those who have worked with Adam in the past, are predisposed towards playing for him, even to the point of renegotiating contracts
4) Thomas will have a greatly improved Tannehill throwing to him vs a downwardly-spiralling Blake Bartles
 
I was very confused on how Thomas is a luxury for the Dolphins...TE hasn't been our strong suit the past couple of years. The analysis of the article seemed like it was a better trade for Miami, but they gave the nudge to Jax? I think it's a good trade for both teams, why can't both teams win in a trade?
 
I was very confused on how Thomas is a luxury for the Dolphins...TE hasn't been our strong suit the past couple of years. The analysis of the article seemed like it was a better trade for Miami, but they gave the nudge to Jax? I think it's a good trade for both teams, why can't both teams win in a trade?

I think they did, particularly if both players stay healthy most of the year.

But even if both are busts, what was lost? Albert was getting cut anyway. Thomas likely was as well.
 
The SI writer omitted the important "Adam Gase factor" which provides several tangible benefits arguing that Thomas for a 7th is worth the "risk."

1) Thomas has actually excelled under his influence - and at 28, it's not like he's exactly over-the-hill!
2) Thomas knows his system and will be immediately "plug and play"
3) Players including Thomas, especially those who have worked with Adam in the past, are predisposed towards playing for him, even to the point of renegotiating contracts
4) Thomas will have a greatly improved Tannehill throwing to him vs a downwardly-spiralling Blake Bartles

Exactly what I was going to say. Imagine with an improved OL, Tannehill with Jarvis Landry, Devante Parker, Kenny Stills(?), Jay Ajayi and Julius Thomas as weapons? Young and loaded. I love it.
 
Im really over every writer calling anything the Fins do a "splash". Yes, we get it, Dolphins splash in the water. Cute play on words, Shakespeare. FFS can some writer be original and good?
 
I think we have to wait and see. If Julius has a great year while Albert misses alot of games (very likely) then we came out ahead
 
Back
Top Bottom