Hagan instead of Booker | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Hagan instead of Booker

pdonavant

Scout Team
Joined
Sep 7, 2003
Messages
53
Reaction score
2
Age
59
Location
Richmond, VA
Does anyone think that we should replace Booker as the #2 receiver with Derek Hagan? I was pretty impressed with his performance in the preseason.
 
It was preseason and he was playing against second,third and fourth stringers you can't take much out of the preseason.
 
Although he drops some balls, Booker has proven to be our only deep threat so far. Culpepper for some reason or another just cannot get the ball to Chambers down field. If we take Booker out, we lose our only somewhat consistent long yard reciever.
 
I don't see why we don't got 3-4 WR sets on 3 step drops. Someone has to be open for Dante for quick slants, dumps, WR screens, etc.
 
pdonavant said:
I understand that completely, but it seems Booker has dropped so many balls.


Booker is dropping passes because he's surprised they're coming to him. :lol: He keeps looking back to see Ronnie catch another dump off.

Seriously though, I give it a few more weeks and we might start seeing Hagan slowly working his way into the game more and more - possibly at Booker's expense.
 
HELLS YES!! BOOKER BLEW MORE PLAYS THAN TRAVARES TILLMAN, YOU GUYS KNOW THAT MORE THAN I DO
 
I am no coach by no means and don't claim to be one, but I think Hagan's height could be more useful to us.
 
with all of our depth we should go 4-5 wr sets but since swiis cheese is the twin of our o-line we cant
 
Booker has dropped more passes than anyone on this team so far.

I mean, 3 drops in one game is inexcusable.. especially that potential TD, hit in stride.
 
Hagan couldn't beat welker, who couldn't beat Booker, who couldn't Beat chambers.
 
SirDrums said:
Hagan couldn't beat welker, who couldn't beat Booker, who couldn't Beat chambers.

More like, Hagan wasnt given a chance to beat Welker, who wasnt given a chance to beat Booker, who wasnt given a chance to beat Chambers. Think if we determined who our starters were in order of performance Chambers and Booker would be 3rd and 4th.
 
BOOK THIS: MARY BOOKER SUCKS! he'll be gone next year. overpaid waste. to think we traded ogunleye for marty booker makes me sick.
 
Back
Top Bottom