fins_rock
Scout Team
Benson will prove to be better than brown or caddy!
chuckcole said:For instance, if a team has Edge and then drafts Ricky
TeeMoney said:You are wrong. Most experts and draftniks had some iteration of Williams, Benson, and Brown as the top 3 with only preference given to what abilities they felt were more important. Most felt that Williams was the fastest of the 3 and regardless of anyone's opinion, you can't deny the effect of a good presentation and great word-of-mouth.
You are greatly biasing your "facts". Both Brown and Williams ran a 4.43 while Benson ran a 4.62 (an average of various reports) at his pro-day
((Pro Day note, Next Level Scouting, Inc) - TEXAS (March 23rd) senior running back CEDRIC BENSON ran between 4.58 and 4.65 in the 40... some had as fast as 4.55, others as slow as 4.68... here's a breakdown of his 40's... he was whistled to stop, as he had a rolling start on his first attempt, slipped on his second attempt, so his times came on his 3rd and 4th attempts...)
The most interesting information regarding the 3 RB's is that Benson's short shuttle is much slower than both the Auburn RB's. That would hurt Benson far worse than a slow 40 time- not to mention the great list of off-field problems and baggage Benson carries with him.
Again, you use false information to deceive the reader- and inflate your bias.
fins_rock said:TeeMoney is very technical on the 40's, and I agree... I believe that Benson will prove to be better than both the Auburn backs. YARDS AFTER contact...It doesn't matter if you run a 4.28 40 if the 1st time you get bumped you fall down. If you know how to read blocks and brake tackles you can run 4.7s and gain 1000+ yrds in the NFL. You may get caught from behind but who cares if you have a good burst and they caught you 50yrds down the field? What was Emitt Smith's 40 time? 4.4? or closer to 4.6?
My ideal situation is we trade the #2 pick to TB, pick up a second and a third (or similar compensation), and bring the Cadillac down to Miami at #5. We then draft a QB later (Frye?).Jaj said:Cadillac will become the next great running back. He's a mix of Curtis Martin and L.T.
Brown will eventually be another Deuce McAllister type back, which isn't bad.
Depending on his team Benson will become a solid, 1300-1400 yard back every year.
LostInPatsLand said:My ideal situation is we trade the #2 pick to TB, pick up a second and a third (or similar compensation), and bring the Cadillac down to Miami at #5. We then draft a QB later (Frye?).
Dolfan1000 said:So my friend and I are arguing about the RBs in the draft- he prefers Cedric, and I prefer Ronnie. He claims that the only reason that I am pro-Ronnie is because the media is rating him #1, and I am being a follower. :shakeno: Ridiculous, I know. ANYWAY, he then tells me that this is why the draft is so great, nobody knows and there are always going to be busts and shocker picks, and in his opinion, Cedric has the most potential to be a star. Then he comes out with this line that really had me thinking, "People also thought Ricky would be better then McNabb!" (Keep in mind- he is an Eagles fan) I mean, not even considering the fact that Ricky is a schmo, I got to thinking whether you can compare a QB and a RB in terms of "who is better". Like, who is to say that if Ricky was not into the ganja that he wouldnt be having a greater impact on our team then McNabb?
I just want your opinion- can you really make such a comparison?
yankeehillbilly said:Instead of RW/McNabb, a better comparison would have been RW/E. James. Ricky was more the power RB much like Benson, while James was more the complete back like Brown. Which would have more impact on your team depends on what kind of offense you have. If you have a QB that can take advantage of a pass catching RB and an OC that likes to mix things up to keep the D guessing then Brown would probably have the most impact. If you have an Offense that runs right, runs left, short out to the WR, then probably Benson would be your best bet.