Help Me Tannehill Supporters | Page 7 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Help Me Tannehill Supporters

ohall said:
I would hope, since RT17 is the starting QB of the team you are supposed to be a fan of RT17 would also have your support.
Click to expand...

We should all be robots, pretend that nothing is wrong? I support who is playing, but when I see real quarterbacks, that haven't had three years of all first team reps, and no time in a new system, and in 1 play, they show that they are legit, and Tannehill still hasn't done that, sorry, I won't kneel and worship Tannehill like some of you do. Kirk cousins in washington, has not had any first team snaps, he came in and has been balling, better and more consistant than Tannehill ever has. What about the back up quarterback in Arizona? he sure looks better than Tannehill, he didn't have first team reps for 3 years, Tannehill, is a good backup quarterback prospect. Tannehill, if he aint done it by now, and is still having the same problems after 3 years, get him out of here. New system is an excuse, it is still football, you still have to be able to thriow the ball accurately, that aint something that is just all of a sudden going to happen, if it aint happend yet. Tannehill completes 1 out of 6 passes that he throws, over 15 yards, he aint going to just wake up one day and majicly solve that issue. stop making excuses for him.
 
Klenton66 said:
We should all be robots, pretend that nothing is wrong? I support who is playing, but when I see real quarterbacks, that haven't had three years of all first team reps, and no time in a new system, and in 1 play, they show that they are legit, and Tannehill still hasn't done that, sorry, I won't kneel and worship Tannehill like some of you do. Kirk cousins in washington, has not had any first team snaps, he came in and has been balling, better and more consistant than Tannehill ever has. What about the back up quarterback in Arizona? he sure looks better than Tannehill, he didn't have first team reps for 3 years, Tannehill, is a good backup quarterback prospect. Tannehill, if he aint done it by now, and is still having the same problems after 3 years, get him out of here. New system is an excuse, it is still football, you still have to be able to thriow the ball accurately, that aint something that is just all of a sudden going to happen, if it aint happend yet. Tannehill completes 1 out of 6 passes that he throws, over 15 yards, he aint going to just wake up one day and majicly solve that issue. stop making excuses for him.
Click to expand...

Ah, another highlight film watcher... excellent.

---------- Post added at 08:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:01 AM ----------
Awsi Dooger said:
Tannehill is the subject of a network experiment. Every time he appears on screen there is a flashing subliminal message, encouraging happy adjustment.
Click to expand...


Odd, I see nothing but angry denying.
 
FinfanInBuffalo said:
Ah, another highlight film watcher... excellent.

---------- Post added at 08:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:01 AM ----------




Odd, I see nothing but angry denying.
Click to expand...


Continue to blindly follow and accept mediocrity....

Tannehill is regressing... facts are facts.....

It's year 3, shouldn't be a regression.
 
walt, i think it is clear they really have no arguement of what qualities Tannehill has to become a better QB. They just want him too really really bad, and they dont want anyone saying otherwise or pointing out the obvious
 
Wallace17Miami said:
Not a bad assessment. I would agree he doesn't make many bonehead decisions.

But I do not think he has a handle on the game. I think he is easily fooled into checking down, and can't read coverage.

I also don't think saying he is a great athlete is something to look for in a QB. There are two great QB's that I would not consider great athletes.... Brady and Manning. You aren't looking for a super athletic guy for the QB position unless you are looking to run an offense like the seahawks. You are looking for a guy that can read defense & is very accurate with pocket awareness.

---------- Post added at 02:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:53 PM ----------




no.
Click to expand...

This is a brilliannt reply! thanks so much. I agree with this totally.
 
walt said:
Thanks for directing us to that thread. Interestingly, your contribution to the thread was to slam Tannehill for poor vision and not seeing a sack coming at him.
Click to expand...
Of course. You can be critical of the QB play while still pointing out the things he's good at. Most here don't understand that concept.
 
walt said:
Thanks for directing us to that thread. Interestingly, your contribution to the thread was to slam Tannehill for poor vision and not seeing a sack coming at him.
Click to expand...

No, my more important contribution to the thread was to call you out for creating a thread that served no purpose than your desire to argue with people.
 
Klenton66 said:
We should all be robots, pretend that nothing is wrong? I support who is playing, but when I see real quarterbacks, that haven't had three years of all first team reps, and no time in a new system, and in 1 play, they show that they are legit, and Tannehill still hasn't done that, sorry, I won't kneel and worship Tannehill like some of you do. Kirk cousins in washington, has not had any first team snaps, he came in and has been balling, better and more consistant than Tannehill ever has. What about the back up quarterback in Arizona? he sure looks better than Tannehill, he didn't have first team reps for 3 years, Tannehill, is a good backup quarterback prospect. Tannehill, if he aint done it by now, and is still having the same problems after 3 years, get him out of here. New system is an excuse, it is still football, you still have to be able to thriow the ball accurately, that aint something that is just all of a sudden going to happen, if it aint happend yet. Tannehill completes 1 out of 6 passes that he throws, over 15 yards, he aint going to just wake up one day and majicly solve that issue. stop making excuses for him.
Click to expand...
Lol @ robots comment.
 
JTC111 said:
No, my more important contribution to the thread was to call you out for creating a thread that served no purpose than your desire to argue with people.
Click to expand...

Although you may have noticed that the only thing I have argued about is the BS that I had no right to set up the thread. As far as Tanny goes, I got a few answers to my question (not from you), and am happy with that, no arguments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom