How Could You Be Pissed!?

Phin_Phan

Active Roster
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
726
Reaction score
0
Age
33
Location
Windsor, Ontario
Now tell me, would any of you actually be pissed if we draft: Rodgers, Smith, Benson, Brown, Cadillac, Edwards or Williams??

Like how could anyone of us be upset with picking one of those 7 guys.....like we could all have our favorites that we want to draft (mine are: Edwards, Benson and Smith) but how could anyone not like having any of these guys on your team!? I think all 7 of these guys will at least some point in their career be a dominate weapon for whatever team they're on.

Tell me what you think and if you would actually be upset about picking "ANY" of these guys.

Example: You want Brown but we get Benson, would you be pissed? Want Williams but we get Edwards......would you be pissed???
 

PeterJNO

Hammered
Joined
Mar 9, 2005
Messages
340
Reaction score
0
Age
31
As long as all our needs, QB, RB, and WR are some how met before the season starts, I'm happy.
 

byroan

Hammered
Joined
Aug 19, 2004
Messages
18,554
Reaction score
0
I wouldn't be pissed, I don't care who Saban chooses because that's who he feels fits the team best.

I'd just prefer to see Brown.
 

LtDan

I am a Dan but not a Lt.
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
7,459
Reaction score
1
Age
53
Location
Eglin AFB (Ft.Walton Beach Fl.)
Nublar7 said:
I would take any one of those guys. The only person I would really be upset with at #2 is Derrick Johnson.
Agreed. That's why I double checked the list before I posted to make sure he wasn't in there
 

knight6jb

Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 18, 2004
Messages
1,231
Reaction score
0
Age
35
Location
Orlando, Fl
I wouldn't be pissed with Brown or Benson, I still think Caddy is the best of the top three. With the WR's I wouldn't say I would be pissed if we drafted Edwards, but I would be scared if we drafted him over Williams.
 

Gonzo

Who dat?
Administrator
Finheaven VIP
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
32,042
Reaction score
4,678
Age
39
Location
Canada
Nublar7 said:
I would take anyone of those guys. The only person I would really be upset with at #2 is Derrick Johnson.
Agreed, Johnson would be a hell of a stretch.
 

godfater21

Second String
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
0
Age
40
Location
Ohio
I would be pissed if we take a QB at #2. I don't see rogers or smith as future hall of famers. there are QBs in the later rounds that will be just as good as those two. I don't want mike williams because i don't like players that put themselves above the team. I like edwards but i don't see a WR as something we need bad enough to take at #2. We need a RB worst of all, so i think that is the way we go and IMO benson is that back.
 

Dolfan2788

Melubulongtime
Joined
Mar 3, 2005
Messages
1,826
Reaction score
0
I won't be pissed if we pick any of those guys but I will be disappointed if we don't pick one of the big 3 RB's. IMO this is probably the only time in the next 10-15 years that we will be at the top of the draft like this. The draft is loaded at the top with great backs and that is one of our needs, I think we should either trade down into the top 10 somewhere with some extra picks involved and pick whichever back falls our way or stay with the no 2 spot and pick our RB of preference.
 

Boik14

Hammered
Joined
Apr 6, 2004
Messages
7,227
Reaction score
0
Age
41
Location
NYC
The only 1 i would be terribly pissed at is Edwards. I just dont get a feeling from watching him and reading about him that he will amount to anything more than the next David Terrell. Sorry if that bothers some of you but I really dont care.

The rest; Id rather deal down because I feel that Quantity > 1 stud player as long as we use the other picks we'd acquire in trading down to fill needs and make good selections but If St Nick feels that theres no deal thats worth taking than any of the other 6 aside from edwards is fine by me.

IMO out of those 7:
Williams
Smith
Brown
Rodgers
Caddy
Benson



Edwards
 
Top Bottom