I voted other, as my excitement level is "meh".
I think that they finally have some young talent on both sides of the ball (mixed in with a few good veterans), but I'm still underwhelmed with the coaching and playcalling. From the moment our Head Coach said that he prefers a short pass based offense (where the short pass mostly replaces the run; same as Philbin), I have been 100% anti-Gase. However, to be fair, Gase does try to add the running game and the deep ball to his offense. The only problem is that he's already wasted two years by not getting decent o-linemen who can both run-block and give Tannehill time to go deep. This is his third season and he's just now starting to really attempt to fix the line. They now appear better on paper, but we'll see. I'll try to change my view of Gase to a "let's see how his offense does this year" stance, but if he continues to keep calling short (or behind the line of scrimmage) passes on 3rd and long like he did with Landry then I'll be right back to looking forward to the next Head Coach!
Defense is where I have a bigger problem with the coaching aspect. From Coyle to Joseph to Burke, the defense has consistently under-performed. There's been poor tackling, players often caught out of position to make plays, poor coverage of the middle of the field, and WAY too many big runs given up at crucial moments. While Miami's dink-and-dunk offense has more than its fair share of 3-and-outs, Miami's defense seems to go out of their way to allow opponents to march right down the field on short passes. It hasn't mattered who was on the field, which leads me to believe that the defensive schemes and playcalling have been more ineffective than the actual players. This would explain why Free Agents who performed okay with their former teams seem to play worse in Miami.