Ross has usually given HCs around 3 to 4 years to improve or get canned. Would you follow the same timeline for Flores, or would you give him additional leeway because we are going into this tenure with the expectation of a total rebuild instead of just some tweaks like previous head coaches?
Time might not be the right basis for making this kind of decision
IMO, more important is seeing what Flores actually brings to the team.
Does he have quality in evaluations that happen in a reasonably timely period ?
Does he have insight in how and what areas need upgrading and proper stages to doing this ?
Does he prepare and has the ability to adjust on the fly when needed strategies ?
Does he know how to use the players he has to there peak abilities ?
The Insight to putting a knowing and crediable staff around him ?
These are more what needs to be evaluated over a time period, though can understand that after a reasonable amount of time there should be adequate growth and levels of success..
But if the FO turns Tannebaughanized it could also throw a hitch in Flores's giddy-up...
Don't want to even think about a Ross decision, thankfully we may not have to for a while...I hope, I hope....