How the **** does atl manage to get white the ball 12x | Page 2 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

How the **** does atl manage to get white the ball 12x

Funny thing is the Bills showed the blueprint for beating them. Spread the field, 3-4 wide, and just attack the middle. That opens things up. But no, Henning probably didn't even watch any tape on the Ravens because we had some retarded *** schemes. I was sitting in my seat wondering why Hartline and Marshall were lined up together (no Bess) on every play, and were running 5 yard routes. It was embarrassing.

yep i was right there with you...and my favorite was when bess came off the field for polite on 3rd and long

---------- Post added at 01:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:22 AM ----------

Atlanta sucked until Rich McKay left Tampa and went to them. Now Atlanta is solid and Tampa sucks. Keep your eye on KC now that they have N.E.'s GM.

tampa hardly sucks...they were a 4th down conversion away last week from beating atl in atl
 
Dudes, give up on the 3 and 4 wide ****. We dont have 4 competent WRs on our roster. The bottom 2 guys are two total bums that we just threw on the roster because we didnt have anyone else. They may be good players down the road, but they are really nothing more than PS guys who made the 53 because we were busy loading up on more cornfed lineman instead of playmakers.
 
we have bess and marshall...everything else is replaceable imo

we have no te...fasano should be the in line guy only...

we have old rbs...

we have no future at qb

we are screwed...
 
yep i was right there with you...and my favorite was when bess came off the field for polite on 3rd and long

---------- Post added at 01:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:22 AM ----------



tampa hardly sucks...they were a 4th down conversion away last week from beating atl in atl


Fair enough Tampa is rebuilding and so far they are having a good season. My point was that good GM's build good teams. Tampa took a step backward when McKay left them and Atlanta started building what they have today. A good GM identifies a teams deficencies and goes out and gets the pieces they need.

Mark my words KC will be a contender and it wont take them over a decade to do it. They have a good GM now.
 
Thanks for making my night much better.

:(

you already know it...

let me add to it...

we have no playmaker at free safety

we have no boundary cb opposite vontae davis

we have no ilb opposite karlos dansby

we have no current replacement for yeremiah bell who is showing signs of falling off weekly

we are screwed
 
Fair enough Tampa is rebuilding and so far they are having a good season. My point was that good GM's build good teams. Tampa took a step backward when McKay left them and Atlanta started building what they have today. A good GM identifies a teams deficencies and goes out and gets the pieces they need.

Mark my words KC will be a contender and it wont take them over a decade to do it. They have a good GM now.

kc is up and coming but matt cassel isn't the guy to get them over the hump...
 
kc is up and coming but matt cassel isn't the guy to get them over the hump...


Cassel is an upgrade to what they had there and he is servicable to them for the time being. My point remains that KC will be built into a team that hast post season relivancy now that they have a decent GM there running things. I forget what they gave up to get Cassle was it a draft pick? I remember they got him cheap.
 
GLAD we have our PREMIER Left Tackle though!

Who Cares about a franchise QB?
A franchise QB isn't a franchise QB laying on his back every play.

What the hell would the difference be if Ryan was here and we still had piss poor playing calling and Henning as the coordinator? Not much, I don't know why people don't understand this, it isn't too difficult.
 
Not for nothing but do you notice something that Ryan, Flacco, and Sanchez all have in common that Henne is lacking, its called being surrounded by a complete offfense. I'm not one to blindly defend Henne just because he is a Dolphin and in all honesty I fully expect more production out of our offense once an experienced veteran takes control @ QB. Lets be honest though if you switched Henne with any of the QB's from those teams and that QB would also struggle in Miami. Our offense is not that good yet and maybe Ryan would perform better here then Henne has but he would not be doing as well in miami as he has been in Atlanta. I do however agree with the people who are saying if you believe you have the opprotunity to get a franchise QB then you take it. The question I have is did we take long because we did not believe any of the QB's available were franchise QB's or did they believe that there was enough franchise QB's in that draft that they would get one of them. That would mean the Trifecta believed that between Ryan, Flacco, Brohm, and Henne there was basically minimal difference in talent among the 4 of them. I am trying to remember but didnt we use our 2 nd 2nd pick on Henne, so he was our third player taken. I can see them evaluating the 4 of them and basically rating them all about the same. As far as Long goes there is no way he would of fell to us in the 2nd rd and many teams took OT's in the 1st rd and they may of not felt comfortable with some of the tackles in that draft and did not want to risk getting stuck with certain ones? Mind you I am only speculating.

If Henne wound up in baltimore or atlanta it is possible he would be having more sucess then who each team has there now. Henne in Atl might of been better for Atl then Ryan in Atl. Atl, Balto, and GB might have all chose the wrong guy but maybe there is only marginal differences between the 4 so the differences do not really jump up at everyone. Wasnt Marino the 3rd or 4th QB to go in his draft. Anyhow thats my feel on it, you guys can carry on with your continued fawning over Ryan (who is good) and the endless amount of "I told you so" posts if it makes you all feel better :lol:


The big question is whats wrong in Miami? I think switching QB's is going to give us a good indication of what the problem is.
 
Back
Top Bottom