How would you solve / would have solved the qb problem??? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

How would you solve / would have solved the qb problem???

fisi

Active Roster
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
2,449
Reaction score
23
Me, very easy would have drafted Matt Ryan. Ha! (roll eyes)

Seriously. would have signed Flynn, give him 5mill with additional 3mill if he becomes the starterplus still draft a qb in the later rounds.

But now, I would still draft Tannehil IF available at 8 but no trade ups If not available I would trade down and my draft will look as thus:

1(20s) Vinny Curry DE/OLB Marshall
2(a) Chris Givens, WR
2((b) Brock Orseiller/ Nick Foles/ Kirk Cousins QBs
3(a) Marvin mcnutt WR
3(b) Ladarius Green TE
4 Sammy Brown OLB houston

In just 4 rounds:
QB problems solved
WR problem solved
Receiving TE problem solved
Pass rusher problem solved with 4 more picks still to come.
 
As of right now I work to trade down in the 1st and add picks. Then take BPA rds 1-3. We need skilled, talented players regardless their position. In later rounds I'd work to fill in gaping holes if there are any. This is a pretty deep draft and we should get good value top to bottom. I'd roll with Moore/Garrard unless someone fell into the right spot, like Cousins in the 3rd. I would refuse to reach simply for need ie. Tannehill in the 1st.
 
I would say, what QB problem? We have a QB named Matt Moore who seems more than capable. The losses in the first half of the season were not because of the QB, they were from what was supposed to be a vaunted defense. Once they got their stuff together the wins came. Let Moore be the starter and draft a QB for the future.
 
Me, very easy would have drafted Matt Ryan. Ha! (roll eyes)

Seriously. would have signed Flynn, give him 5mill with additional 3mill if he becomes the starterplus still draft a qb in the later rounds.

But now, I would still draft Tannehil IF available at 8 but no trade ups If not available I would trade down and my draft will look as thus:

1(20s) Vinny Curry DE/OLB Marshall
2(a) Chris Givens, WR
2((b) Brock Orseiller/ Nick Foles/ Kirk Cousins QBs
3(a) Marvin mcnutt WR
3(b) Ladarius Green TE
4 Sammy Brown OLB houston

In just 4 rounds:
QB problems solved
WR problem solved
Receiving TE problem solved
Pass rusher problem solved with 4 more picks still to come.
The qb situation as is...draft a qb in the 2nd.Idk if green will be there in the 3rd bro.I think he is one of the only true pure te in the draft and will be in high demand in the 2nd. Do you like mcnutt? Maybe because of the Iowa coaching staff.well we do need another bigger receiver I guess
 
If it were up to me there would be NO controversy.

After last season, I would have made sure that they accentuated the positive ending of the season, the positive offensive improvement and the QB play of Moore. The fact that it is the first time we had both a 1,000 yard rusher and reciever, and the fact that we actually won some home games compared to the previous season. Instead of this we had the owner taking a MASSIVE dump on the entire team and stinking it up in every concievable way. How would you feel if you played as well as Moore did just to have your boss take a dump on you in front of the whole world?

I would have traded Marshall but I wold not have said anything about making a 'BIG SPLASH' and about 'signing Manning' or about sigining 'Flynn'. Manning was obviously a bad fit considering we just hired a new Offensive minded head coach who specializes in the West Coast Offense.

Draft a QB and do it the right way.
 
Trade down in the first, pick up another 2nd rounder and draft Weeden.

If Weeden is gone when we pick, I'm building weapons around Moore and rolling with him into next season. This is a problem that will solve itself, if Moore plays well then great, we have a quarterback. If he plays poorly, with the way this team is now we're probably a 4-12 team and we'll have a shot at Barkley....

I still can't believe we dumped ****ing Brandom Marshall. UGH.
 
Trade down in the first, pick up another 2nd rounder and draft Weeden.

If Weeden is gone when we pick, I'm building weapons around Moore and rolling with him into next season. This is a problem that will solve itself, if Moore plays well then great, we have a quarterback. If he plays poorly, with the way this team is now we're probably a 4-12 team and we'll have a shot at Barkley....

I still can't believe we dumped ****ing Brandom Marshall. UGH.


I cosign on that one, even though it would be a horrible season. With the depth at other positions in this draft, if we miss out on Tannehill (cle takes him), build around Moore and Garrard as stated. It wont win fans over or sell tickets, better yet it would create anarchy. But nonetheless, we leave behind hopefully cheap and developing talent for the next qb (free agent or draft pick, that becomes our only number one priority next year - possible trade up scenarios).

I dont like it either way but this is the type of draft if you can flip picks for more picks, I would do it. Next Year is QB draft (like this year was suppose to be).
 
The Raiders gave up a 3rd round pick this year to pick up Terrel Pryor. I would give them our 3rd round and maybe even Moore for Pryor.
 
If I was starting the offseason over again, I put out as many lines as possible and see who bites. First find out from Coach Philbin who he wants and does not want. Put a line out to Manning, explore trade possibilities (for example, ask the Saints what it would take to get Brees), bring in any decent free agents: Matt Flnn, Jason Campbell, Kyle Orton, etc... for a workout, and draft a QB in the first and second round this year. Keep trying till you find someone who can do the job.
 
Back
Top Bottom