Hue Jackson and AJ Mcarons | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Hue Jackson and AJ Mcarons

morrism35

Rookie
Joined
Nov 13, 2005
Messages
339
Reaction score
1
They more than likely would both be available. Jackson is the closest sure thing to a can't miss coach, and Mcarons is one of the better backups with an upside to be a solid NFL starter. Can't think of a more attractive tandem.
 
Hue Jackson def needs to be on the short list of HC candidates.
 
This board was jerking off over Brock Osweiler like four weeks ago.

Just saying.
 
Oh look, another team made a nice play, better make a thread about why they should be in Miami. Seriously, can't people just contribute to threads that already exist as opposed to littering the forum with this?

P.S. Hue is my choice for head coach, but he will probably turn us down.
 
Hue Jackson won't turn us down.

Ross is an old guy. Jackson is probably hoping he can do what he did in Oakland and take over the team, start pissing away first round draft picks, and then throw the owner's heir under the bus on his way out of town.
 
Hue Jackson is one of my top coach choices. If Hue signs with Miami, it would make a lot of sense to bring in McCarron as a backup.... could challenge Tannehill IF he continues to regress. I would like to have the kid on the roster, either way. Don't know if Cincy lets him walk at this point.

This is far more realistic competition for the 2016 season than RG3 as suggested in the Miko thread.
 
It's not like a sure fire Tom Brady or Cam Newton is waiting for us in the draft. I'm looking at other qb's on someone else bench that may have some upside. If we get rid of Tanny that
s were our next QB is coming from.
 
Ryan Tannehill is going to be your starting QB in 2016. You may think this is a good thing. You may think this is a bad thing.

But it is a thing.
 
They more than likely would both be available. Jackson is the closest sure thing to a can't miss coach, and Mcarons is one of the better backups with an upside to be a solid NFL starter. Can't think of a more attractive tandem.

You mean except for the time he missed.

This forums logic is often hysterical. "In order to replace an .500 coach who threw his players under the bus, we must hire an .500 coach who threw his players under the bus".

Can't see how that would backfire at all.
 
Ryan Tannehill is going to be your starting QB in 2016. You may think this is a good thing. You may think this is a bad thing.

But it is a thing.
This right there should pop up every single time anyone wants to start a thread... And you need to click OK in order to move on and start writing... Im sure it would lower thread volume on the same exact subject...
 
Ryan Tannehill is going to be your starting QB in 2016. You may think this is a good thing. You may think this is a bad thing.

But it is a thing.

Lol thats just wishful thinking no one can predict how the new regime will proceed in the offseason with a Quarterback the team doesn't believe in.
 
This right there should pop up every single time anyone wants to start a thread... And you need to click OK in order to move on and start writing... Im sure it would lower thread volume on the same exact subject...

We have the WHOLE offseason to discuss Ryan Tannehill...:chuckle:
 
Back
Top Bottom