BE GOOD
Pick and choose Wayne...
If Culpepper was 100% healthy what would our record be? I'd say 2-2. Because either way the line is still horrible. But at least he would be able to get out of the pocket easier.
Culpepper was 100% healthy last year, and threw 12 interceptions to 6 touchdowns with 5 fumbles over less than 7 games. And the team went 2-5. This made him the 28th ranked quarterback in the NFL in 2005. As soon as he got injured the team started a six game winning streak.BE GOOD said:If Culpepper was 100% healthy what would our record be? I'd say 2-2. Because either way the line is still horrible. But at least he could get out of the pocket easier.
OrlandoFinsFan said:Without an O-line it doesn't matter if you have Peyton Manning back there....nobody can do it by themselves...nobody!!
adamprez2003 said:Yeah David Carr was horrible yesterday
dolfanatic23 said:we would still suck because culpepper would still hold on to the football waaaaayyyyy too long
gunn34 said:You're right on df23. I wish people would stop blaming the O line. They are better then last years O-line, but many people look at the sack numbers to define them. Most of the sacks are the QB's fault because he doesn't get rid of the ball. He has had plenty of time back there...more then Danny ever had...he just doesn't get rid of the ball. He looks lost and confused.
gunn34 said:You're right on df23. I wish people would stop blaming the O line. They are better then last years O-line, but many people look at the sack numbers to define them. Most of the sacks are the QB's fault because he doesn't get rid of the ball. He has had plenty of time back there...more then Danny ever had...he just doesn't get rid of the ball. He looks lost and confused.
littlemarino said:If he cant find his second or third option it doesnt matter if he is healthy. If his first option isnt there he should run the ball every time. its the only thing he is good for.