You know, there was an interesting tidbit in Ireland's recent press conference regarding finding players to particular schemes.
We all know that roughly half the NFL is now running some version of the 3-4. Ireland acknowledged that and stated that that definitely goes into their draft strategy. He also stated that going to the 3-4 was an advantage even as little far back as when Dallas did because it still wasn't a popular scheme. Think back when Ware and Merrimen went back to back at 11 and 12. If that same 2005 draft were to happen today, no way do those guys fall to 11 and 12 because of the huge need for OLB. I'm saying this even if we had no idea what type of players they would become. A guy like Casey Hampton that went 1-19 or Vince Wilfork that went 1-21 probably don't fall that far in this draft (again without knowing their NFL futures).
However, Ireland did say that it is best to choose players that were not just one dimensional guys or in other words fill one position at one particular scheme. Take for instance Tony McDaniely, or Randy Starks or even Philip Merling. Those are guys that can fit in either the 3-4 or 4-3. It's interesting to hear and makes me think that even if prospect like Hood or Perry may not fit the tradition 3-4 scheme that may not matter because they could present the best value at 25. Why pigeon hole oneself? If that does happen, it clearly means that our 3-4 scheme may in for some adjustment. I'd welcome it because it's going to be awfully tough to find the right nose tackle and right outside linebacker or even inside linebackers in today’s draft landscape.