nyashfan
For Earth Below
...will the FinHeaven perception be that he deserved the job based on merit or will it be predominantly that the organization is so dysfunctional that they couldn't land a qualified outside candidate, whether it is Caserio or Dawson?
Clearly the media hacks will spin it as further evidence of the ineptitude of the organization. That is a given. What concerns me is that the fans will say that Gaine wasn't going anywhere so that it was imperative to hire someone outside the organization. I'm not sure that is fair to Gaine even though there are advantages to hiring an outsider.
I will also say the following, knowing that I expect few to agree with me: I will have less respect for Ross if he modifies his stated organizational structure in order to accommodate Caserio. Yes, I understand Caserio's appeal because he comes from a successful and rival organization; however, it is not easy to discern what exactly were his responsibilities for the Patriots, and I have to trust that Ross, through these interviews, will learn exactly what they are whereas the fans and the media can only speculate. It is not as though Caserio is currently a GM with a proven track record--he comes with risks as do the other candidates.
As has been stated, the Patriots' drafts of late have not been stellar; rather, they do a better job identifying mid-level free agents that thrive in their system. Even that is not the most important reason to consider someone from the Patriots organization. What the Patriots do far better than any other organization is understand how and when to turn over their roster. It is the ability to execute trades of aging veterans nearing the end of their prime for high round draft picks and knowing when not to resign such players for large contracts that distinguish the Patriots from other organizations. How they dealt with Richard Seymour and Ty Law are quintessential examples that come to mind.
Don't get me wrong, I believe that managing the roster turnover is a critical component of being a successful GM. In fact, one could argue that it is as important as having successful drafts. And it is appealing to envision Caserio bringing that expertise to the GM position while retaining Gaine as an assistant GM handling the collegiate personnel evaluation. That being said, if Gaine is the best candidate then it would seem unfair to deny him this promotion. And if I were Ross I would not cave in to Caserio should he only be willing to accept the position provided that certain organizational changes are made to meet his demands. Ross is the owner and accordingly has the right to establish the organizational structure that makes him the most comfortable.
Clearly the media hacks will spin it as further evidence of the ineptitude of the organization. That is a given. What concerns me is that the fans will say that Gaine wasn't going anywhere so that it was imperative to hire someone outside the organization. I'm not sure that is fair to Gaine even though there are advantages to hiring an outsider.
I will also say the following, knowing that I expect few to agree with me: I will have less respect for Ross if he modifies his stated organizational structure in order to accommodate Caserio. Yes, I understand Caserio's appeal because he comes from a successful and rival organization; however, it is not easy to discern what exactly were his responsibilities for the Patriots, and I have to trust that Ross, through these interviews, will learn exactly what they are whereas the fans and the media can only speculate. It is not as though Caserio is currently a GM with a proven track record--he comes with risks as do the other candidates.
As has been stated, the Patriots' drafts of late have not been stellar; rather, they do a better job identifying mid-level free agents that thrive in their system. Even that is not the most important reason to consider someone from the Patriots organization. What the Patriots do far better than any other organization is understand how and when to turn over their roster. It is the ability to execute trades of aging veterans nearing the end of their prime for high round draft picks and knowing when not to resign such players for large contracts that distinguish the Patriots from other organizations. How they dealt with Richard Seymour and Ty Law are quintessential examples that come to mind.
Don't get me wrong, I believe that managing the roster turnover is a critical component of being a successful GM. In fact, one could argue that it is as important as having successful drafts. And it is appealing to envision Caserio bringing that expertise to the GM position while retaining Gaine as an assistant GM handling the collegiate personnel evaluation. That being said, if Gaine is the best candidate then it would seem unfair to deny him this promotion. And if I were Ross I would not cave in to Caserio should he only be willing to accept the position provided that certain organizational changes are made to meet his demands. Ross is the owner and accordingly has the right to establish the organizational structure that makes him the most comfortable.
Last edited by a moderator:
