I look like a worm with the guts slung out of it
Is "clutch" real or myth in terms of the QB position?
- Thread starter Mach2
- Start date
JamesWsenior
Club Member
Is she an optometrist?
No she's a Doctor
JamesWsenior
Club Member
Well when you said she looks 19, I assume she was an optometrist
Last edited:
Harold Jackson
I are smartter then you
It's a myth ,like momentum
phinsforlife
Active Roster
i couldn't find tua on the list, maybe he is somewhere in the vicinity of jamarcus russell?
phinsforlife
Active Roster
mac jones is ranked higher. maybe waddle was on to something?Tannehill is 11!
TUA...
EPA is a made up formula based on hypothetical’s. When we don’t live in fantasy world and look at actual outcomes we can see that while a limited sample size, only Mahomes has better outcome %.
Lmao. Who the hell is mipbj? **** source. Not credible
Someone who did an actual study and not something useless like thinking epa matters. Completely unbiased as well, he’s a huge chargers/herbert fan and it was painful for him to even post this with Tua near the top. He’s also not verified which means he gets nothing off clicks making him far more reputable than people who like to post things like thinking epa matters at all only to get as much engagement as possible.
phinsforlife
Active Roster
so says the guy who constantly uses EPA and other nerd stats. tua ranked well ahead of tom brady in this chart LOL, especially when i cannot even think of a big game tua has won. in fact he hasn't because he has ZERO playoff wins, and in tua's one good and complete year, he crapped himself down the stretch against better opposition. notice the sample sizes as well, which are the top of the bars. maybe tua came up big against a few teams that were ultimately 5-11 early in some seasons. my lord, this is fantasy land
Last edited:
I’ve never used epa as an argument for tua. I don’t need a fake made up formula based to back up my claims as there’s actual real results such as qb rating/comp%/leading the league in yards that can do that for me.
The chart has nothing to do with big games so not sure why you’re going off an a no relevant tangent about it? It’s simply looking at opportunities when given in one score games or tied games.
Nobody said he’s better than Brady obviously sample size matters but that’s irrelevant because it doesn’t change the fact his success rate is high.
You guys have a clan meeting or something tonight? Weird to dig up like a months old post then all of sudden the entire cult shows up within minutes.