dlockz
Hall Of Famer
For those that feel that Frerotte was chosen to groom, which he possibly could be. Ponder this.
If this was the case we should have drafted or acquired a QB this year. Why would we waste a year of development since Gus has already played 12 years?
Okay many say we draft a guy for this system this year for him to groom since we will not start a rookie. Okay since we are at worse a .500 team we will not have much chance to draft an elite QB. Okay so since we are drafting as possible project, How many of these guys are ready to play in a year? The majority of them are not, so then we may have longer to wait which seems more than likely. So then Frerotte is our starter for a possible three years. Does anyone on this board actually think that is a wise plan since there are no guarantees. I see way too many wholes in this theory. I think we ended up with Frerotte as a starter but the groom theory does not make sense with nobody to groom already here. Saban knows the NFL so he knows there is no magic number of years for a rookie to sit and learn. I think we truly assume too much in the presence of no real evidence. Could this turn out to be the scenario(Anything can happen in an everchanging game but I doubt a coach as good as Saban really is planning that especially with our draft position.)
So there goes my theory we were stuck with Frerotte as QB basically because he did not realize Feeley would look so bad. I think those that think that we will not try to upgrade Qb if a good free agent is available will be wrong and I'm sure one better than Frerotte should not be hard to find.
If someone believes the scenario of Frerotte, name an example of some other team doing that. The Qb has to be as bad as Frerotte and Cinncy might not count because did they really know they were going to be that bad or did they think Kitna was the answer when they acquired him? Plus he had been the starter for two years before they drafted Palmer and had been a starter for three years before that In seattle and was only about 28 at time of acquisition.
Go as far as to say whom we acquire and draft and do you really think they will be ready in one year or are you satisfied with Frerotte for as long as it takes(weird for a stopgap)
I'm asking for serious replies. I think have asked legitimate questions?
If this was the case we should have drafted or acquired a QB this year. Why would we waste a year of development since Gus has already played 12 years?
Okay many say we draft a guy for this system this year for him to groom since we will not start a rookie. Okay since we are at worse a .500 team we will not have much chance to draft an elite QB. Okay so since we are drafting as possible project, How many of these guys are ready to play in a year? The majority of them are not, so then we may have longer to wait which seems more than likely. So then Frerotte is our starter for a possible three years. Does anyone on this board actually think that is a wise plan since there are no guarantees. I see way too many wholes in this theory. I think we ended up with Frerotte as a starter but the groom theory does not make sense with nobody to groom already here. Saban knows the NFL so he knows there is no magic number of years for a rookie to sit and learn. I think we truly assume too much in the presence of no real evidence. Could this turn out to be the scenario(Anything can happen in an everchanging game but I doubt a coach as good as Saban really is planning that especially with our draft position.)
So there goes my theory we were stuck with Frerotte as QB basically because he did not realize Feeley would look so bad. I think those that think that we will not try to upgrade Qb if a good free agent is available will be wrong and I'm sure one better than Frerotte should not be hard to find.
If someone believes the scenario of Frerotte, name an example of some other team doing that. The Qb has to be as bad as Frerotte and Cinncy might not count because did they really know they were going to be that bad or did they think Kitna was the answer when they acquired him? Plus he had been the starter for two years before they drafted Palmer and had been a starter for three years before that In seattle and was only about 28 at time of acquisition.
Go as far as to say whom we acquire and draft and do you really think they will be ready in one year or are you satisfied with Frerotte for as long as it takes(weird for a stopgap)
I'm asking for serious replies. I think have asked legitimate questions?