Isaiah Bond???? | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Isaiah Bond????

G

gregorygrant83

Active Roster
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
12,240
Reaction score
13,742
Got curious to why Isaiah Bond went undrafted and so a far unsigned a a udfa. I knew he had a pending assault charge of a sexual nature, but wasn't sure details.Figured it mush be a pretty open and shut case for teams to stay clear of him altogether.

After researching found details and I'll be curious to see how it plays out in court. Apparently the woman filed the complaint stating that Bond had texted her and said he would be in Texas and wanted to see if the two could hook up. The two made arrangements and even discussed having sexual relations. Then the affidavit says he requested a particular sexual activity and she said she wasn't sure she wanted to do that and they could discuss it at the time. Fast forward to them hooking up, things get hot and heavy, then Bond brings up the act they discussed earlier. She says she told him she wasn't ready to go there, apparently Bond goes there anyway even holding his hand over mouth at one point as she was repeatedly telling him to stop. The statement goes on from there, saying she later told him he was wrong for what he did and he said something along the lines of... "Alcohol makes me do crazy things!"

I will be interested to see who it plays out because she did consent to having sexual contact with him, but not to the contact he took it too. I would guess her saying stop and him ignoring her plea should be enough for an open and shut case, if her claim is correct and the jury believes the evening played out as she says it did. After all no means no and stop means stop. Where I'm not sure is once consent is given in one area can someone claim they got general sexual consent and that be enough? I would hope not, but will be interested to see how it plays out and if the jury can be convinced the consent was only granted for some activities and not others. At that point it's very much one sides word vs another. One side is saying I gave consent to this, but not that and the other just saying general consent was needed and general consent was given.

If he wins the case I would guess teams swoop in to pick up a 2nd or 3rd round talent at an udfa price.
 
Last edited:
I posted just because people were wondering why the Dolphins and other teams were staying so hands off with Bond as opposed to how they've treated some other situations with pending charges. While it sounds to me that Bond was in the 100% wrong if her claims are correct, not sure how in court you handle the part of giving sexual consent to some degree, but not to the degree he went. How does an attorney prove a case like that in court?
 
Last edited:
I bet every team had a PI look into it, and he wasnā€™t drafted and wasnā€™t signed as an UDFA.

Says all I need to know. Tyreek Hill 2.0 drama is unwelcome
 
gregorygrant83 said:
I posted just because people were wondering why the Dolphins and other teams were staying so hands off with Bond as opposed to how they've treated some other situations with pending charges. While it sounds to me that Bond was in the 100% wrong if her claims are correct, not sure how in court you handle the part of giving sexual consent to some degree, but not to the degree he went. How does an attorney prove a case like that in court?
Click to expand...

Regardless of what happens in court, if he was told no to something and forced it I don't want him on my team. If he does end up in jail, maybe he'll find out just how wrong what he did was.
 
Dynastybuilder said:
Regardless of what happens in court, if he was told no to something and forced it I don't want him on my team. If he does end up in jail, maybe he'll find out just how wrong what he did was.
Click to expand...
To me it expands the area of what constitutes an assault. I had never really thought of it, but if a woman consents to have sex and asks you not to ejaculate inside her and you do it anyway that is actually an assault of a sexual nature. Bottom line is if someone says don't do this or no, than common sense says don't cross the line. I'm just not sure how you prove that the line was drawn in a court of law.
 
JamesWsenior said:
Why are discussing this guy and his alleged activity here at all? He ain't no Phin, won't be no Phin, and I got one am ok with it.

Nobody wants this guy obviously.
Click to expand...
Because, despite what we the fans want, he is an option the Dolphins might consider at wr.
 
gregorygrant83 said:
Where I'm not sure is once consent is given in one area can someone claim they got general sexual consent and that be enough? I would hope not, but will be interested to see how it plays out and if the jury can be convinced the consent was only granted for some activities and not others.
Click to expand...
Not sure how you've missed it, but it's fairly settled at this point via the law. Once the person says no or stop to something, that's it. It's done regardless of any prior consent. However, if you need the "law" to tell you that then you should probably reflect on your entire life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom