It seems like the latest mock drafts have the "draft experts" stuttering. | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

It seems like the latest mock drafts have the "draft experts" stuttering.

juniorseau55

juniorseau55

Go Fins
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
7,995
Reaction score
6,349
Location
Orlando, Florida
I am just generating a discussion here that at the end of the day will turn into disagreements by the masses.
Some experts now have Atlanta drafting Sewell, and some experts have us drafting Waddle at 6.
There are some experts that have Atlanta drafting Pitts. Others believe that the bengals might end up drafting a WR.
And no matter how you look at this it appears most of everyone recognizes that we need an offensive playmaker. It seems
that our recent trade ended up having people backpedal as usual. At the end of the day the players with the highest skill
ceilings are not other than Sewell, and Pitts. And there is a possibility that both may be come before we even get to draft.

The chances of Miami drafting a receiver in the first round based on history alone are pretty low. In the last 2 decades we used the pick twice on a WR in the first round.
Miami also in my mind give me the impression that they seem to want to invest in the wide receivers they drafted.
So the biggest question that I have for the brothers in this group, what pick would disappoint you the most? Would picking
Waddle over Chase disappoint you? Would picking anyone but Pitts disappoint you if he happens to be there?
 
I think to call any of them "experts" is a stretch. Most of them are guessing in their bathrobe while on the barco lounger in their Mom's basement. After the first three picks, it's total guess work. I think it goes:
1. Jax - TL
2. NYJ - Wilson
3. SF - Fields
4. ATL - Sewell or Parsons
5. CIN - Chase
6. Pitts
 
Fin-Loco said:
I think to call any of them "experts" is a stretch. Most of them are guessing in their bathrobe while on the barco lounger in their Mom's basement. After the first three picks, it's total guess work. I think it goes:
1. Jax - TL
2. NYJ - Wilson
3. SF - Fields
4. ATL - Sewell or Parsons
5. CIN - Chase
6. Pitts
Click to expand...

Yea you are in the Pitts wagon too. Imagine if we end up drafting Parsons instead of Pitts. I somehow get the feeling our front office feels complacent with our receivers corp, and wants someone disruptive in defense.
 
Fin-Loco said:
I think to call any of them "experts" is a stretch. Most of them are guessing in their bathrobe while on the barco lounger in their Mom's basement. After the first three picks, it's total guess work. I think it goes:
1. Jax - TL
2. NYJ - Wilson
3. SF - Fields
4. ATL - Sewell or Parsons
5. CIN - Chase
6. Pitts
Click to expand...
Has Parsons been linked to Atl?

I don't disagree by the way, I have been saying they need to fix their defense as priority one.
 
Mark_J said:
I'd be ok with Chase but Paye needs some work before he's a full time starter. I think his ceiling is at 'good' but not 'great' and at 18 we should be able to draft a player that will become great...
Click to expand...
I don’t even love Chase for Miami. I like Pitts and the two Alabama guys better.
 
Mach2 said:
Has Parsons been linked to Atl?

I don't disagree by the way, I have been saying they need to fix their defense as priority one.
Click to expand...
Linked isn't really a dependable thing. We know they need D and Parsons lit it up at his pro day so I would just guess at it being likely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom