Parsons is a beast, and so is Philips. I mean I wanna ask you a question since I know you don't have a Parsons bias. I have gone back to many websites that shoot out mid season grades. And also websites that shoot out pseudo votes such as "rookie of the year". Parsons come into mind in that list, but if Philips has more sacks than Parsons then does he actually deserve to win that award?
Depends on other stats. TFL not from sacks, forced fumbles etc. And of course there's bias in big plays/playing for a team on the national spotlight.
Say Parsons ends with 14 sacks, 13 tfl non sacks 4 ff and 100 tackles. *
Phillips ends up with 16 sacks, 4 tfl non sacks, 1 ff 60 tackles **
*prorated numbers
**prorated but added emphasis on additional sacks due to more PT
I say Parsons should still win it.
Imo he would need to fall off a cliff with Philips posting multiple games with 2 or more sacks for it to be a race.
What Parsons has over Phillips to voters other than total tackles was his ability to show up in national games too.
Chiefs game he had 2 sacks and a lot of pressures.
Vikings game had 11 tackles 4 for losses and some where big time stops in 2nd half
Raiders game he was in carrs face all game and had 5 hits along with a sack.
And the way he makes his presence known is something too. His power on passmoves or open field speed or the way he hits.
In splash plays(sacks, tfl, pressures, 3rd/4th down stops etc) he was leading the entire NFL prior to this past weekend.