He didn't fare as well against SEC big time corners. Clemson had a good front 7 not necessarily a great backfield, hence the outcome...Just trust your own eye balls and have a good weekend my friend.
He didn't fare as well against SEC big time corners. Clemson had a good front 7 not necessarily a great backfield, hence the outcome...Just trust your own eye balls and have a good weekend my friend.
Sorry. I completely disagree. He does use physicality to beat press coverage. That's not a bad thing. Can run every route efficiently and he attacks the ball. He's not super fast, but the season off I'll bet didn't affect his ability to get open. 3 of the best press coverage teams did not slow him down at all.Chase is great. If you want to rank Chase, Smith, Waddle, and Pitts in any order, I'm really not going to argue with you. If you feel really convicted about any of them, I'll say you're probably right.
But, Chase doesn't beat press efficiently or with any real technique or plan, and he's not particularly good in general early in his routes. He's awesome downfield, and he's awesome after the catch. He knows how to separate late, and that's the big thing that makes him more than a jump-ball receiver. With his talent, I think he'll improve on his weaknesses.
Your opinion, but many including myself disagree on Chase. LSU had a plethora of weapons and Chase could pick and choose when to turn it on and when to take a play off.Sorry. I completely disagree. He does use physicality to beat press coverage. That's not a bad thing. Can run every route efficiently and he attacks the ball. He's not super fast, but the season off I'll bet didn't affect his ability to get open. 3 of the best press coverage teams did not slow him down at all.
Preference I guess, but Chase is just about as complete as any WR in this draft. Smith is dynamic too. So is Waddle.
Sorry. I completely disagree. He does use physicality to beat press coverage. That's not a bad thing. Can run every route efficiently and he attacks the ball. He's not super fast, but the season off I'll bet didn't affect his ability to get open. 3 of the best press coverage teams did not slow him down at all.
Preference I guess, but Chase is just about as complete as any WR in this draft. Smith is dynamic too. So is Waddle.
lol that's brutal. In what universe can that other guy say Chase couldn't beat press in this game. Absolutely incredible.
"Well, except for a few big plays and TDs!", I guess he'd reply.
Could be, that's true, but usually in this situation, particularly with a young first time HC, he is hired to execute the vision of the GM. It's more likely, IMO, that Sirianni was hired specifically for Hurts, not the other way around, and was told about moving Wentz and moving on when he took the job.I agree. But its a new coaching staff in Philly. The allegiance to Hurst may be short lived. I understand the F/O in Philadelphia is steadfastly behind the guy they took. But it could be they edge their bets by taking another QB in the draft.
Here’s another video of Jamarr chase having success against SEC press man coverage.He didn't fare as well against SEC big time corners. Clemson had a good front 7 not necessarily a great backfield, hence the outcome...
Smith is the better prospect in my opinion ...but that heisman jinx ?Smith was much better vs press than Chase. It's not close.
Well Derrick Henry is rolling out 2000 yard seasons and Lamar Jackson is an NFL MVP so there is that.Smith is the better prospect in my opinion ...but that heisman jinx ?
Seriously? He has more game than just bullying people to get past press. There is so much more to his game. I think he will be just fine. You won't have to scheme him open. The narrative about him and press is not correct.How would he do against a defense like Tampa's? Run them over? Catch over them?
That's why we have opinions so we can offer all the great differences we have as humans. That said...the press coverage angle people are jumping on is...ridiculous in my opinion. You can like either Smith or anyone else. All good. I guess we will see. In any case I don't want any WR at 3. 6-8 is ideal for me.Your opinion, but many including myself disagree on Chase. LSU had a plethora of weapons and Chase could pick and choose when to turn it on and when to take a play off.
I am with you on the trade down. As for plethora of weapons Chase still got off and it's not like Smith doesn't play with the same type of players.That's why we have opinions so we can offer all the great differences we have as humans. That said...the press coverage angle people are jumping on is...ridiculous in my opinion. You can like either Smith or anyone else. All good. I guess we will see. In any case I don't want any WR at 3. 6-8 is ideal for me.
Here’s another video of Jamarr chase having success against SEC press man coverage.
The best argument for Devonta smith defeating man coverage significantly better than jamarr chase is that there’s plenty more film of Devonta smith doing it.
in this video you’ll see CJ Henderson play Jamarr chase really well. However you’ll also see Jamarr chase have success playing inside. Many people are pigeon holing chase as strictly a boundary receiver which doesn’t make sense to me. He had great success inside in 2019.
Jamarr chase terrorized these cats across from him at 19 years old. Devonta smith is a damn good player. One of the best college football receivers I’ve laid eyes on. But to Pretend like these two belong in different stratospheres is insane to me.
Roger McCreary of Auburn played Jamarr chase really well. Roger McCreary is still in college. Jamarr chase however did find success against both him and Noah Igbinoghene.
neither one of these guys are worth the #3 overall pick most years. But teams w/ top 5 picks don’t typically have teams ready to compete but in need of receivers.
jamarr chase is a pretty safe bet. He’s Amari Cooper. He’s AJ brown.
truth be told, I don’t care for either at #3. It doesn’t check out on the “value chart”. However we’re an outlier. Most teams w/ the #3 picks don’t have the same needs and makeup as we do.