Apparently not because your only replies are unrealistic responses to logical thought such as responding to the two year mark--which is a fairly well accepted timetable around the NFL--by saying , "well golly, why don't we just wait 10 years then." The draft is for building a team longterm, not going to the superbowl that year. Rarely does it work out that the rookie added was the only missing peice before a superbowl run. I think that tends to be due FA and a team getting used to a certain well-coached system and then excelling in it. We have both of those going into this season. If the rookie manages to crack the starting line up and excel, that's icing on the cake, but it is probably best not to plan on it happening every time.
As for the draft, he was drafted after Huff, Whitner, Hill and just before Cromartie; though he was rated above most of them in many circles until questions over his hip injury came into play. There were fears it was a permanent injury, fears which were debunked before we drafted him. Most of his weaknesses are coachable, but it will take time. The same can be said for the other 4.