You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter datruth55
- Start date

Would not shock me he is a nice player but he is not without flaws - the would have been TOs affect W and L column

The Bills dodged a few Ls last season but that is over and done we shall see if they can get away with this in the future

Worth 40 million per hell no

I do kno he is careless taking hits and it will catch up to him

I do kno he puts the ball on the carpet and it will catch up to him he was darn fortunate as he was with some of the drops but every QB has fumbles and Near INTs

Still Keeping the Jills together not likely with that upcoming salary

The Bills dodged a few Ls last season but that is over and done we shall see if they can get away with this in the future

Worth 40 million per hell no

I do kno he is careless taking hits and it will catch up to him

I do kno he puts the ball on the carpet and it will catch up to him he was darn fortunate as he was with some of the drops but every QB has fumbles and Near INTs

Still Keeping the Jills together not likely with that upcoming salary

Last edited:

Oh come on lol

A little OT, but for years, I've wanted a more accurate INT stat. Take out those last second Hail Mary's and 'bounced off the receiver's chest' and add in things like dropped INTs. I suspect the results would be interesting.

Back to topic, as ANU said, Allen seemed to play more sloppy late in the season. Better teams? Injury? No idea, but '21 will be interesting

Back to topic, as ANU said, Allen seemed to play more sloppy late in the season. Better teams? Injury? No idea, but '21 will be interesting

On a tangent, I'd like to see a better metric for scoring efficiency to replace Red Zone efficiency.

Soooo Winston could have had 51 ints in 2019? That’s pretty impressive.

Points per red zone visit?On a tangent, I'd like to see a better metric for scoring efficiency to replace Red Zone efficiency.

Points per red zone visit?

Something along the points per drives

(#TD * 6) + XP + (#FG * 3) + (#2pc * 2) all divided by (#Drives *7)

By drives, I means possessions.

So, if Miami had 7 possessions, the denominator would be 49.

Lets say, for giggles, they had 3 TD's, all XP's & 1 FG... the numerator would be 24.

The new metric (scoring efficiency) would be approx. 49%

Doesn't need to be a percentage. Just average hiw many points per RZ trip a team gets.Something along the points per drives

(#TD * 6) + XP + (#FG * 3) + (#2pc * 2) all divided by (#Drives *7)

By drives, I means possessions.

So, if Miami had 7 possessions, the denominator would be 49.

Lets say, for giggles, they had 3 TD's, all XP's & 1 FG... the numerator would be 24.

The new metric (scoring efficiency) would be approx. 49%

2 tds and xps plus two fgs over 4 visits would be 5 points per visit.

Doesn't need to be a percentage. Just average hiw many points per RZ trip a team gets.

2 tds and xps plus two fgs over 4 visits would be 5 points per visit.

Or, it could be done your way. The current method IMO is incomplete.