Juju Brents | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Juju Brents

#44 pick in 2923, rookie starter for the Colts, he has been on roster for all 10 weeks.

It's not 1 game. He looked good for the Colts too. He just caught the injury bug for a while and Ballard wanted to make a statement cutting bait on all his mistakes, trying to avoid getting fired.

I don’t know exactly what happened in Indy. But you don’t just cut a top 50 pick 2 years later because of some bad luck injuries. Continuous soft tissue injuries could be from lack of work and discipline in taking care of their body. It’s not always the case but there’s more to this case than we know.
 
Was he drafted in same draft as cam smth ?
 
So this is completely over the top — but how funny would it be if he becomes Sauce Gardner and Sauce Gardner flops?
 
I don’t know exactly what happened in Indy. But you don’t just cut a top 50 pick 2 years later because of some bad luck injuries. Continuous soft tissue injuries could be from lack of work and discipline in taking care of their body. It’s not always the case but there’s more to this case than we know.

That's true for every FA pickup in the NFL.
What else is new? - LOL
 
Stupidest thing I have seen today. Just got it in too. Didn't think it was going to happen but you saved the day. Well done.

Oh yeah ? And what makes you think that?

it's not inconceivable to think Juju can become a solid additon that came out of nowhere just like Sieler did a few years ago.

It is not inconceivable to think Siegler's play has dropped this season after getting the bag.

I'm quite curious to hear your take.
Attacking posters for the sake of it, without giving your take, that's weak as ****.
 
Last edited:
Oh yeah ? And what makes you think that?

it's not inconceivable to think Juju can become a solid additon that came out of nowhere just like Sieler did a few years ago.

It is not inconceivable to think Siegler's play has dropped this season after getting the bag.

I'm quite curious to hear your take.
Attacking posters for the sake of it, without giving your take, that's weak as ****.

I've given reasons in here. Zack has been surrounded by rookies. Now that they are starting to get in the groove of things his production is starting to pick up. Previous two years he had Wilkins and he had Campbell beside him. Common sense 101
 
He looked great, just boggles the mind how it took until Week 10 to get him in the lineup, I'd like to hear from McDaniel and Weaver on that one

I’m not certain Weaver is the best of teachers. It took a good while for players that were here all training camp and even last season to start gelling this year. That or this defense didn’t trust in him and were being turds. Brents got here in Sept.
 
He looked like a CB1. The game didn't look too fast for him. He looked like he knew his assignments. Whoever gets him this offseason will a gem.
Is he only here on a 1-yr. deal? We need to re-sign this guy. Honestly, last Sun. he looked like the best CB we have had in years.

(Edit: Seeing that someone says we have him through '26. I think he is the real deal, he plays tight in coverage. Now will that translate well to speed WR's? I don't know, but he must have practiced against Hill and he is a starting CB now.)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom