- Mar 1, 2004
- Reaction score
- Calgary Alberta
I agree, with one exception.I think we do … no need to put all eggs in one basket when you have a shot at something great vs something good … if it works out you have a very good back up on a cheap contract or a decent commodity for trade … regardless you never stop planning for tomorrow IMO
Right on. Yeah, for sure! I was an RT supporter for a loooong time, but finally came to terms with he was just average.Rosen isnt even that. His pocket presence is better and as a 2nd year player he has a decent deep ball,thats about itNot you bro
I am laughing along side - Tannehill was heaps better than what we have
I wanted to believe Tanne but he couldn’t work it out on the grand stage - he is still better than what we have and that is why they sent him away As Tua has been the targetRight on. Yeah, for sure! I was an RT supporter for a loooong time, but finally came to terms with he was just average.Rosen isnt even that. His pocket presence is better and as a 2nd year player he has a decent deep ball,thats about it
If he keeps improving then the answer would be yes but bear in mind that for some there is nothing Rosen could do which would change their minds on drafting a QB.Just a question be easy on me , if Rosen keeps improving do we really need to draft a qb or one that is already proven?
Bad example. Wentz was drafted by Philadelphia when Foles was not on the team. Foles was drafted in 2012 in the 3rd round and traded a couple years later. Philly picked him up as an FA in 2017.Two good QBs on a team will hurt nothing just like the Eagles had in Foles & Wentz. If something happens to 1 maybe the other can get you to the SB. Yes...They still need to spend a high pick on a QB
I could go with that. If Rosen would be declared as our franchise QB (if he improves enough) I would not be opposed to draft a QB in later rounds. Just not in the 1st round. 1st round is only for QB if you need a franchise QB (i.e. if Rosen would not improve).Yes, we need to draft another one... but the real debate is whether we do it in the first round or on the third day of the draft.
I have been a proponent of the third day strategy.
Stop it. Nobody declared Rosen to be anything. Most like to give him a chance. And if he improves and becomes our franchise QB then, yes, you build around him.Has Rosen improved? Sure
Enough to not draft a qb? No.
Rosen is playing at level below what we got from Tannehill, and people hated on him for years and years. Yet Rosen "looks good enough to build around"
C'mon man, you know theres posters here who think he's shown enough to bypass a qb. I know youre on the wait and see boat and thats fineStop it. Nobody declared Rosen to be anything. Most like to give him a chance. And if he improves and becomes our franchise QB then, yes, you build around him.