BLITZKRIEG said:If we're serious about wanting Owens, it would be wise to trade for him. Less bidding competition for his services. Once he's on the market, there could be a tidal wave of suiters....
PHINZ RULE!!!!
cnc66 said:let's say Saban does NOT want a cancer in HIS lockeroom...
BALLS DEEP said:The argument would be: Potential cancer in the locker room VS: Known terror on the playing field!
I think Saban's Disciplinarian mind will choose on the side of the scoreboard.
cnc66 said:not me, we will get where we want to go without him, let him tear up and divide someone elses locker room.
PerfectFinz72 said:With that said, would you be "upset" if the Dolphins did not land TO?
BALLS DEEP said:Well it's kinda a win/win thing. If we don't get him then it's because Saban decided that he isn't the best for our team. Which I'm cool with. He knows a heckuva lot more than I do.
But just imagine TO on one side with CC on the other with Ricky and Ronnie in the backfield. Don't forget about McMichael and Booker too. How could a defense cover them all? Everyone would demand double coverage!
PerfectFinz72 said:Agreed. Although, I am opposed to him being here....I do agree that it can be win/win. If we don't get him and he does well somewhere else (which I doubt that will happen without distractions) I forsee alot fans being in an uproar because they knew he would be a model citizen here etc.
So, while it can be win/win, it could be lose/lose from other fans perspectives.