The only reason the Bengals gave up alot of sacks is bc Burrow held the ball a long time looking deep down field.
Tua had no time to ever attempt that.
Anyone who thought their line was as bad as ours doesn't know their ass from a bowl of potato salad.
View attachment 108969
For everyone saying that the Bengals O line was just as bad.
Dude has tried to learn the game and speed of the game under the worst of circumstances that the NFL has to offer, can’t think of any rookie that’s had it tougher frankly..
just give him some time to set up and throw and all that talent that’s some can’t see will be in HD.
but they'll will say elite qb's don't need a line.The only reason the Bengals gave up alot of sacks is bc Burrow held the ball a long time looking deep down field.
Tua had no time to ever attempt that.
Anyone who thought their line was as bad as ours doesn't know their ass from a bowl of potato salad.
Right. Cincinnati also had a competitive running game.The only reason the Bengals gave up alot of sacks is bc Burrow held the ball a long time looking deep down field.
Tua had no time to ever attempt that.
Anyone who thought their line was as bad as ours doesn't know their ass from a bowl of potato salad.
Also had upper echelon set of skill players..Mixon..Higgins..Chase..Boyd..decent tight end.Right. Cincinnati also had a competitive running game.
Oh, last year there was a big difference between 31 and 32. 21 was light years ahead of us. We were not anywhere near close 32nd place.Some clowns on here saying there isn't much of a difference between an OL ranked 21 and 32nd Please stop with that ignorant nonsense.