Local Media Reporting Continues to Wallow in Incompetance | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Local Media Reporting Continues to Wallow in Incompetance

ckparrothead

Premium Member
Joined
May 24, 2002
Messages
52,592
Reaction score
7,256
Location
Tampa, FL
I guess the Fort Lauderdale Sun Sentinel thought it would be cute to have two high school football coaches write reviews of the Dolphins-Panthers game (one from the Dolphins' perspective, another from the Panthers' perspective) in order to give insight to readers from real guys who are in the "football know"

Instead, what they came up with was the following collections of excrement.

Rick Swain Reviews the Dolphins
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/...ep26,0,5975685.story?coll=sfla-dolphins-front

Charles Hafley Reviews the Panthers
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/...ep26,0,1967639.story?coll=sfla-dolphins-front

And, of course, the following is my email to Brian White, Sports Editor of the Sun Sentinel...

Brian,

I’ve been reading Sun Sentinel dolphins articles for a long time. I like Ethan Skolnick and have corresponded with him on numerous occasions. I have also generally approved of Alex Marvez.

However, I saw the recent reviews by high school football coaches Rick Swain and Charles Hafley, and I just have to say that I may know LESS about football after having read them. The articles possess a genuinely stupefying effect. They were both crammed with the Captain Obvious Madden-esque observations that have you slapping your forehead in frustration. At the moment, I would imagine a palm reader could read my future without asking me to put out my hands.

I approve of the general idea, actually; having guys in the “football know†give reviews of the game in order to give the public some rare insights into knowledgeable football evaluation. I often feel that local sports reporting lacks actual football knowledge along with the willingness and ability to break down game tape in order to do in-depth analysis of certain aspects of the team. That would require someone who was very knowledgeable about football, with the capability of putting together cogent thoughts, and with a feel for the public interest. Pretty rare is the lad that is cut out for such deeds.

The Swain/Hafley drivel was so perverted an attempt to accomplish this that it nearly drew me into a bloody red berserker rage, Ray Lewis style.

Here are some of the greatest hits:

“If Miami wants to use the short passing game, as they did early on, they need to run the ball better. They were in third-and-long too many times.â€Â

-Rick Swain on the Dolphins (Thanks for the insight John Madd-, err Captain Obvious.)

“In the end they went to a zone blitz instead of the man coverage, and the robber intercepted the pass.â€Â

-Rick Swain on the Dolphins (Didn’t Lance Schulters just get done explaining for us in-depth how during the play in which he intercepted the ball, he had been designated as man coverage on the tight end? The tight end blocked, leaving him to double-team Colbert, which put him in position to intercept the ball. I believe Mr. Swain needs to retreat to his copy of Madden 2006 and remember the subtle difference between the red lines and the yellow ovals…)

“They ran the ball well… They ran first with misdirection to set up the short passing game. Most of the time it did work.â€Â

-Charles Hafley on the Panthers (Excuse me? Would you like to run that one by me again? Stephen Davis, Deshaun Foster, and Steve Smith combined for 61 yards on 26 carries and this constitutes running the ball “well� Their longest run took them 9 yards, and they gained 4 or more yards a mere 9 times. At least last week, against the Jets, you could say that the Jets ran the ball well on the three drives in which they plowed deep into Dolphins territory. This week, the Panthers ran a total of 8 times for 17 yards on all four of the Panthers scoring drives).

“I wasn't impressed with the Panthers' offensive line because of no 100-yard rushing game.â€Â

-Charles Hafley on the Panthers (First off, contradict much? Second, way to get real in-depth on that one. “I’m not impressed with the Dolphins because of no super bowl trophy.†Yeah, ok. Thanks.)

“The defense gave up a 100-yard runner. They gave up too many runs over 5 yards; too many big plays over 15 yards.â€Â

-Charles Hafley on the Panthers (No, thank YOU Captain Obvious. Real thumbs up on that one).

“One mistake [the interception] was the difference between a touchdown and a field goal.â€Â

-Charles Hafley on the Panthers (Come again? Were you watching the wrong game? One mistake [the interception] was the difference between a game winning field goal by the Panthers and a game winning field goal by the Dolphins, MISTER football.)

You know, I really hate to be so hostile about this one (Ok I lied, I love being hostile about pieces of human waste like this) but let’s be honest here. I have valid points. Hafley was flat out mistaken in about half of his review to the point you wonder which game he was watching. Neither came up with anything that an 80 year old grandmother could not belt out with only a half hour’s worth of training on Madden 2006. When Swain astutely tried to explain the complexities of the Dolphins’ moving from man coverage to zone coverage, he was flat out contradicted by a player.

Geez man, I mean, if this is the kind of stuff that makes it into the paper, give me a call. I’ll write for you.


Thanks,

Chris Kouffman
 
Wow, man that was harsh. Its still better than the Heralds post-game reports, no?
 
way to get him CK... i dont get to read the herald or the sentinel anymore because i live in cali, but from your review it doesnt look like im missing much.
 
I agree. Those reviews were on par with what you'd expect from a Center at a half-time interview. Saban's style is to let the defense hold until you can take advantage of some errors? WTF? I think this guy is a year late in his assessments.
 
“In the end they went to a zone blitz instead of the man coverage, and the robber intercepted the pass.â€Â

-Rick Swain on the Dolphins (Didn’t Lance Schulters just get done explaining for us in-depth how during the play in which he intercepted the ball, he had been designated as man coverage on the tight end? The tight end blocked, leaving him to double-team Colbert, which put him in position to intercept the ball. I believe Mr. Swain needs to retreat to his copy of Madden 2006 and remember the subtle difference between the red lines and the yellow ovals…)
:sidelol: Thanks CK I needed that.
 
Keep at them Ck. That analyisis looked like it was written by a couple of 8 year olds. I can't believe a newspaper would allow their name/rep. to be attached to writing like that.
 
First of all, CK, you are my favorite poster. Secondly, you missed this:

"[font=Verdana,Arial, Helvetica] Saban's theory is not to lose on offense, hope for field position and count on the defense to win games for them.

Overall until they need to get a better running game, or they'll have trouble winning the big games. It was even on both sides, but Miami's ability to make defense plays decided the game."

Our offense under Saban & Linehan has been twenty-fold more aggresive than in the past decade. Zach also credited the offense with getting their backs, because they (read: defense) almost lost the game.

Also RB ran for over 130 yrds!!!!!! How do you improve on that?

Anyway, here's to you keep the press honest! :beerbang:
[/font]
 
hardly surprising the gimmicks newspapers reach for anymore...

my questions to you is: why do you really care so much what they do at the SS?
 
PressCoverage said:
hardly surprising the gimmicks newspapers reach for anymore...

my questions to you is: why do you really care so much what they do at the SS?

I think that is some of the problem here. If no one holds newspapers/cable news accountable for some of the ridiculous crap they put out there it will just keep getting worse. I for one like to point out the problems instead of shrugging them off. I especially like how in-depth CK takes it.
 
PressCoverage said:
hardly surprising the gimmicks newspapers reach for anymore...

my questions to you is: why do you really care so much what they do at the SS?

ckparrothead said:
..... give me a call. I’ll write for you.


;)


He certainly would be an improvement.
 
What kills me is the imposter on Channel 7.

I want to see what Drew has to say but their sportscaster is a joke. I can't believe they have not fired that *d*ot yet.

He is like a comedian only he's not funny. All he does is insult & denigrate the coach and the team. When Zach was on his show in the preseason I thought he was going to body slam him. I think they had a little altercation on the commercial break.

Duces was good but he's been gone for a few years already.

Did you hear that female impersonator from the stone age, P0pe yesterday after the game at the press conference? :fire:
 
Finascious D said:
First of all, CK, you are my favorite poster. Secondly, you missed this:

"[font=Verdana,Arial, Helvetica] Saban's theory is not to lose on offense, hope for field position and count on the defense to win games for them.

Overall until they need to get a better running game, or they'll have trouble winning the big games. It was even on both sides, but Miami's ability to make defense plays decided the game."

Our offense under Saban & Linehan has been twenty-fold more aggresive than in the past decade. Zach also credited the offense with getting their backs, because they (read: defense) almost lost the game.

Also RB ran for over 130 yrds!!!!!! How do you improve on that?

Anyway, here's to you keep the press honest! :beerbang:
[/font]

Exactly what I was thinking we threw the ball 33 times and what? 40 somthing last week? how is that siting back and leting the D win games???:shakeno:
 
ether79 said:
I think that is some of the problem here. If no one holds newspapers/cable news accountable for some of the ridiculous crap they put out there it will just keep getting worse. I for one like to point out the problems instead of shrugging them off. I especially like how in-depth CK takes it.

but even if said paper "keeps getting worse"... so what?... do you depend on the SS for your dolphins news?.... i wouldn't.... i get all i need about the dolphins on MiamiDolphins.com, the NFL network and monday morning quarterback on ESPN...

the internet replaced newspapers as a viable media source years ago...

now, newspapers feel they need to survive on gimmicks and snazzy graphics and charts and images these days... they gave up on informed, meaty, well-written, lengthy stories years and years ago... informed fans are in the minority, and all they care about is selling papers to the majority... it will never change, and if that editor is anything like my old one, he doesn't really care what informed fans think... he's going to run whatever gimmick helps sell more papers... i ranted about it all here:

http://www.finheaven.com/boardvb2/showthread.php?t=93804&page=2&pp=15&highlight=drivel
 
Geez man, I mean, if this is the kind of stuff that makes it into the paper, give me a call. I’ll write for you.

And there we have it, the real motivation for that e-mail. CK wants to be a writer too. way to weasle in CK.
:goof: j/k
 
Back
Top Bottom