- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Messages
- 2,213
- Reaction score
- 269
The Fins have made a bunch of bad to mediocre QBs look great this year. Specifically, Pennington (with hurt shoulder), Holcomb, Vick (obviously not bad, but not usually efficient), Dilfer, Bollinger and Pennington have all been extremely efficient against us. Against the Fins, these guys combined to go:
113/173 (65%), 1275, 10 TD, 1 INT, QB Rating: 104.1.
Against the rest of the NFL, these guys went:
718/1273 (56%), 7943, 41 TD, 44 INT, QB Rating: 71.4.
That difference in QB ratings is basically the difference between the best QB in the NFL and the worst. The better QBs, e.g., Brady, Delhomme, Plummer, etc. have not fared nearly as well. How do you explain this difference? The possible explanations seem to be:
1. We blitz more/less against the lesser QBs.
2. We play more/less zone against the lesser QBs.
3. We simply don't scheme as much against the lesser QBs.
4. We try to scheme too much against the lesser QBs.
5. We have a bend-but-don't-break attitude with the lesser QBs.
What do you think?
113/173 (65%), 1275, 10 TD, 1 INT, QB Rating: 104.1.
Against the rest of the NFL, these guys went:
718/1273 (56%), 7943, 41 TD, 44 INT, QB Rating: 71.4.
That difference in QB ratings is basically the difference between the best QB in the NFL and the worst. The better QBs, e.g., Brady, Delhomme, Plummer, etc. have not fared nearly as well. How do you explain this difference? The possible explanations seem to be:
1. We blitz more/less against the lesser QBs.
2. We play more/less zone against the lesser QBs.
3. We simply don't scheme as much against the lesser QBs.
4. We try to scheme too much against the lesser QBs.
5. We have a bend-but-don't-break attitude with the lesser QBs.
What do you think?