Math to the Draft: Breaking Down DeCastro | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Math to the Draft: Breaking Down DeCastro

NUGap

Active Roster
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Messages
236
Reaction score
14
This is my third installment of the Math to the Draft series, this week I'll be looking exclusively at David DeCastro. I've seen a lot of DeCastro and I'm absolutely in love with him and his pulling prowess. I mostly wanted to see whether or not the Dolphins would be justified in picking him at 8. While I only looked at him, so there's no other guard to compare to, I still think the numbers are interesting.

I looked at 4 games of Stanford and recorded each run in those games - where along the line they went, whether or not DeCastro pulled, and whether they were in zone or man on the plays where DeCastro did not pull. I came out to 144 runs for 773 yards overall (for those playing at home, that comes out to 5.37 Yards Per Carry)

First we're going to look at the percentages of runs along the line, how often the plays went to certain sides, etc. This chart isn't the most scintillating thing in the world, but it's going to set up the rest of what we're talking about:

# Runs
Run LT%
Run LG%
Run RG%
Run RT%
Pull Left
27.78
4.86
0.00
2.08
34.72%
Man
0.00
4.17
18.06
4.86
27.08%
Zone
4.17
6.25
9.72
18.06
38.19%
31.94
15.28
27.78
25.00

If you're looking at the chart, you could see that 27.78% of the time, DeCastro would pull left and the running back would run outside the Left Tackle, and so on and so forth. The highlighted numbers are the plays I consider DeCastro to be directly involved in. These are when the RB ran through the hole created by DeCastro on the RG% and when he followed DeCastro on the pulls either off-tackle left or through the LG hole.
  • When we add up all the highlighted plays, we can see that DeCastro was directly involved in 60.42% of the plays.
  • The pulling left play was by far the most popular play, 27.78% of the runs were pulls by DeCastro and then run off left tackle
  • In a weird coincidence, another 27.78% of the runs were behind DeCastro when he stayed in-line on the right side, there were no times when he pulled and the RB went through the RG hole, so the two 27.78s are mutually exclusive
  • Normally Stanford runs a combination of man and zone blocking, but far more zone as you can see in the 38% zone compared to the 27% zone, but when DeCastro stayed in line, they used far more man-blocking schemes when they went to his side
We've all heard about DeCastro's pulling prowess, but let's see how the Yards Per Carry breaks out over all the different O-Line combinations

YPC
Run LT
Run LG
Run RG
Run RT
Pull Left
6.5
5.71
4
Man
5.83
3.85
5.57
Zone
5.5
5.33
3.29
6.15

Before I say anything about the numbers here, let me say that these numbers aren't meant to definitively determine DeCastro's performance, just something to think about. None of these numbers are in a vacuum, each play involves all Stanford O-line and the TEs
  • I wasn't surprised by the high YPC on the left-pulling plays, you can see it on film without the numbers, at 6.5 yards per carry - the pulling play by DeCastro was the most productive play to run in the Stanford offense - it combined the strengths of Jonathan Martin and David DeCastro to go left
  • However, I was amazed by the low YPC on the right side runs in both man and zone behind DeCastro. I noticed on film that they were running it a lot and expected it to be productive. It really wasn't, at least according to my criteria and coding. These two were the lowest YPCs out of all the runs. It wasn't like I had a small sample size either - I had 40 runs between the two.
Those are a bunch of scattered numbers though and they're a pain to read, let's consolidate them:

Pulling DeCastro
6.38 YPC
In-Line DeCastro
3.65 YPC
Others
5.73 YPC
Total
5.37 YPC
  • On all pulling plays, a gaudy 6.38 YPC, to be expected
  • The non directly-DeCastro plays averaged 5.73 YPC
  • Overall the line averaged 5.37 yards per carry
Just a few musings on the 3.65 yards per carry for DeCastro in-line. I was really surprised to see that, I was expecting total domination by DeCastro. It doesn't mean that he's categorically bad at in-line blocking or anything. We have to remember that on a man play through DeCastro's side, we're also relying on the Center to get a solid block or even the pulling LG. On zone plays to DeCastro's side, we're relying on the other offensive lineman to get out into the second level and block down on the LBs. It could even be that when DeCastro gets to the second level on other zone/man plays he makes the rest of the line look good and is actually boosting the YPC on other ones. It does give me a little bit of a pause that almost every other play is above 5 except for both of his. Take it however you like.

That was a lot of data coding for not a lot of output, but I hope you found it interesting. I focused far more on the run than I did on the pass, but I have a little bit of bonus material!

Here are percentages of how often DeCastro was either uncovered, single blocking or double blocking in pass coverage:

Uncovered26.90%
Single57.93%
Double15.17%

I'm not sure that tells you anything relevant at all, but I was watching the tape anyway, figured I'd at least write it down.

That's what I have for this week, hope y'all enjoyed. From what you've seen/heard and hopefully read on here - would you be unhappy if the Dolphins picked DeCastro at 8? What about if they traded down to 15 and picked him? There are certainly a lot of holes on the roster, but I'm sure DeCastro is one, if not the safest pick in the draft. I'd like to hear your thoughts.
 
Best one yet, because he's my guy, if we dont get Tannehill at #8 i hope we pick up DeCastro............
 
This is my third installment of the Math to the Draft series, this week I'll be looking exclusively at David DeCastro. I've seen a lot of DeCastro and I'm absolutely in love with him and his pulling prowess. I mostly wanted to see whether or not the Dolphins would be justified in picking him at 8. While I only looked at him, so there's no other guard to compare to, I still think the numbers are interesting.

I looked at 4 games of Stanford and recorded each run in those games - where along the line they went, whether or not DeCastro pulled, and whether they were in zone or man on the plays where DeCastro did not pull. I came out to 144 runs for 773 yards overall (for those playing at home, that comes out to 5.37 Yards Per Carry)

First we're going to look at the percentages of runs along the line, how often the plays went to certain sides, etc. This chart isn't the most scintillating thing in the world, but it's going to set up the rest of what we're talking about:

# RunsRun LT%Run LG%Run RG%Run RT%
Pull Left27.784.860.002.0834.72%
Man0.004.1718.064.8627.08%
Zone4.176.259.7218.0638.19%
31.9415.2827.7825.00

If you're looking at the chart, you could see that 27.78% of the time, DeCastro would pull left and the running back would run outside the Left Tackle, and so on and so forth. The highlighted numbers are the plays I consider DeCastro to be directly involved in. These are when the RB ran through the hole created by DeCastro on the RG% and when he followed DeCastro on the pulls either off-tackle left or through the LG hole.
  • When we add up all the highlighted plays, we can see that DeCastro was directly involved in 60.42% of the plays.
  • The pulling left play was by far the most popular play, 27.78% of the runs were pulls by DeCastro and then run off left tackle
  • In a weird coincidence, another 27.78% of the runs were behind DeCastro when he stayed in-line on the right side, there were no times when he pulled and the RB went through the RG hole, so the two 27.78s are mutually exclusive
  • Normally Stanford runs a combination of man and zone blocking, but far more zone as you can see in the 38% zone compared to the 27% zone, but when DeCastro stayed in line, they used far more man-blocking schemes when they went to his side
We've all heard about DeCastro's pulling prowess, but let's see how the Yards Per Carry breaks out over all the different O-Line combinations

YPCRun LTRun LGRun RGRun RT
Pull Left6.55.71 4
Man5.833.855.57
Zone5.55.333.296.15

Before I say anything about the numbers here, let me say that these numbers aren't meant to definitively determine DeCastro's performance, just something to think about. None of these numbers are in a vacuum, each play involves all Stanford O-line and the TEs
  • I wasn't surprised by the high YPC on the left-pulling plays, you can see it on film without the numbers, at 6.5 yards per carry - the pulling play by DeCastro was the most productive play to run in the Stanford offense - it combined the strengths of Jonathan Martin and David DeCastro to go left
  • However, I was amazed by the low YPC on the right side runs in both man and zone behind DeCastro. I noticed on film that they were running it a lot and expected it to be productive. It really wasn't, at least according to my criteria and coding. These two were the lowest YPCs out of all the runs. It wasn't like I had a small sample size either - I had 40 runs between the two.
Those are a bunch of scattered numbers though and they're a pain to read, let's consolidate them:

Pulling DeCastro6.38 YPC
In-Line DeCastro3.65 YPC
Others 5.73 YPC
Total5.37 YPC

  • On all pulling plays, a gaudy 6.38 YPC, to be expected
  • The non directly-DeCastro plays averaged 5.73 YPC
  • Overall the line averaged 5.37 yards per carry
Just a few musings on the 3.65 yards per carry for DeCastro in-line. I was really surprised to see that, I was expecting total domination by DeCastro. It doesn't mean that he's categorically bad at in-line blocking or anything. We have to remember that on a man play through DeCastro's side, we're also relying on the Center to get a solid block or even the pulling LG. On zone plays to DeCastro's side, we're relying on the other offensive lineman to get out into the second level and block down on the LBs. It could even be that when DeCastro gets to the second level on other zone/man plays he makes the rest of the line look good and is actually boosting the YPC on other ones. It does give me a little bit of a pause that almost every other play is above 5 except for both of his. Take it however you like.

That was a lot of data coding for not a lot of output, but I hope you found it interesting. I focused far more on the run than I did on the pass, but I have a little bit of bonus material!

Here are percentages of how often DeCastro was either uncovered, single blocking or double blocking in pass coverage:

Uncovered26.90%
Single57.93%
Double15.17%

I'm not sure that tells you anything relevant at all, but I was watching the tape anyway, figured I'd at least write it down.

That's what I have for this week, hope y'all enjoyed. From what you've seen/heard and hopefully read on here - would you be unhappy if the Dolphins picked DeCastro at 8? What about if they traded down to 15 and picked him? There are certainly a lot of holes on the roster, but I'm sure DeCastro is one, if not the safest pick in the draft. I'd like to hear your thoughts.

I'd personally be happy with DeCastro if we got him at 8.

If we were able to trade down to 15 and still get him, I would be estatic. The more draft picks you get, the more chances you get to hit on somebody.
 
I'd personally be happy with DeCastro if we got him at 8.

If we were able to trade down to 15 and still get him, I would be estatic. The more draft picks you get, the more chances you get to hit on somebody.


#15 too far i think, i think he will be gone by then............
 
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Is-Stanford-OG-David-DeCastro-worth-a-top-10-pick.html

- Sits into his stance well and exhibits a flexible lower half.
- Showcases good initial quickness off his frame when asked to reach defenders trying to shoot gaps on either side of him in pass protection.
- Keeps his base down through contact and exhibits natural balance when asked to slide his feet laterally.
- Extends his arms well, exhibiting good hand placement under the chest plate of defenders and sticks well through contact.
- Showcases quick hands when asked to re-set through the play and maintain leverage laterally.
- Rarely gets overextend/off balance with his footwork through contact. Showcases natural fluidity when asked to shuffle and slide, and with ease can push his man past the pocket inside.
- Exhibits plus range laterally, can re-direct cleanly and is tough to side-step/disengage from in pass protection.
 
http://www.nfl.com/combine/profiles/david-decastro?id=2533043

[h=4]Weaknesses[/h] Decastro is inconsistent when finishing run blocks downfield in terms of keeping his hands engaged on his man. There were times in 2011 when he would fall off his blocks at times -- although never an effort issue, there are some slight hitches in his bending and footwork as he is engaged in contact and moving downfield that cause him to fall off slightly. He is not a very violent puncher with his hands but doesn't necessarily need to be being the technician that he is.
 
http://draftbreakdown.com/scouting-report-david-decastro

Pass Blocking


DeCastro is solid in pass protection, helping keep all-world QB Andrew Luck safe for the past three years. While possessing only average anchor strength, DeCastro fights for leverage with his hands and stay under the pads of his opponent consistently well. He keeps his arms extended in pass protection and does a good job keeping his feet moving and maintaining balance. Larger defenders may give him trouble on the inside at the next level. DeCastro is listed at 310 lbs. but is very lean looking and has the frame to add some weight in the NFL.

Run Blocking


DeCastro’s main area of excellence is run blocking. He easily walls off defenders in the run game, and never seems to get beat at the point of attack. He uses quick feet to pull and is as good at locating defenders at the second level as I’ve seen. DeCastro may not be a dominant drive blocker (which may come with some added bulk) but he keeps his legs churning with good effort and has the ability to move defenders off the ball. He plays RG at Stanford mainly because of the power rushing attack they use, which has him pulling on seemingly every run play. DeCastro can easily transition to LG in the NFL.
 
http://draftbreakdown.com/scouting-report-david-decastro

Pass Blocking


DeCastro is solid in pass protection, helping keep all-world QB Andrew Luck safe for the past three years. While possessing only average anchor strength, DeCastro fights for leverage with his hands and stay under the pads of his opponent consistently well. He keeps his arms extended in pass protection and does a good job keeping his feet moving and maintaining balance. Larger defenders may give him trouble on the inside at the next level. DeCastro is listed at 310 lbs. but is very lean looking and has the frame to add some weight in the NFL.

.

Thanks for the comments. As far as pass blocking, while I didn't explicitly count hurries or sacks given up, I did watch every pass play. I looked at 4 games, Oregon State, Oklahoma State, Arizona, and USC. Informally, I probably saw him give up 2-3 hurries and 1 sack. I would count that as better than the rest of the line from what I saw. Kind of confirms what that scouting report says - he's not going to really knock your socks off with pass blocking, but I think he's already above average for the NFL. Some more time in an NFL program and he'll be very solid in pass blocking.
 
bottom line is the guys a once a decade interior oline prospect...this is steve hutchinson except better college tape type stuff...decastros terrific in line or on the move...terrific...top 10 bpa in this draft all day long...and with this new cba and the way guys are paid at the top of the draft well worth top 10 money...
 
bottom line is the guys a once a decade interior oline prospect...this is steve hutchinson except better college tape type stuff...decastros terrific in line or on the move...terrific...top 10 bpa in this draft all day long...and with this new cba and the way guys are paid at the top of the draft well worth top 10 money...

If this actually comes true then with a bullet he's worth the #8 spot.

I've like DeCastro for awhile now. He's Def a blue chipper at his spot in a draft where there are maybe 4 or 5 at their respected position. (Luck, T-Rich, Kalil, Decastro and Luke)
 
DeCastro is a stud. The guy will dominate for years. That said, Ireland will be crucified if he is the pick.

No more safe picks for Ireland. We need a high impact player, Colpes, Tannehill are probably two of the higher risk higher reward guys.
 
Back
Top Bottom