May catch some flack for this.... | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

May catch some flack for this....

Fins could drop to 7 and get a stud, those Wr will be there but I would love Pitts at 7, and get the receiver at 18, but If I was drafting for them I would chose a Stud wr at 3., Tua's arm doesn't seem strong, so I would get Jaylen Waddle so they affect the middle of the field, or Pitts.
 
Krush said:
Fins could drop to 7 and get a stud, those Wr will be there but I would love Pitts at 7, and get the receiver at 18, but If I was drafting for them I would chose a Stud wr at 3., Tua's arm doesn't seem strong, so I would get Jaylen Waddle so they affect the middle of the field, or Pitts.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes:

Neither is Brady's (7 SB)
 
Dmefoc said:
What about... instead of #3..

trade down get an extra 2/3 round pick.

select Pitts, get an elite TE.

Harris at 18

LB of choice at next pick

use gained pick from trading down on a WR, I haven’t seen a lot of love for, but watched him closely... Amon-Ra St Brown. I truly believe he will be an elite WR in the NFL. Goes after the ball, genetics are good (father a body builder) to add weight if needed. You won’t have the chemistry with Waddle/Smith after their comments. Why waste the pick?

not to mention I’ve seen lots of talk about adding at the wr through FA.

Thoughts?
Click to expand...
A trade down from #3 better net them a whole lot more than an extra 2 or 3 my friend. But otherwise yes, you can expect them to do something like that to acquire more draft ammo. Pitts is certainly gaining a lot of momentum recently. Free agency will say a lot about whether Harris is in play at 18.

I have not seen the WR you speak of so I cannot comment.
 
Much more reasonable than a lot of other stuff I’ve seen here. I’m a huge Harris mark (was a Jonathan Taylor mark last year) and I wouldn’t mind at all if he’s taken at 18.
 
Keep in mind Travis Kelce, a generational TE and perhaps the greatest TE of all time, was taken in the 3rd round. We will not be taking Pitts at #3, not because he isn’t a good player, but because he’s not a position of need. He’s a luxury pick. We already have a top ten TE. If we trade down even a few spots I still don’t see us taking a TE that early. We desperately need WRs, LB, DE, S, OC and a RB before we go TE. Some of these spots will be filled thru FA, most likely OC and DE/LB, and that will show us what direction the draft will look like. JMHO
 
Pitts to me is one to trade up for after picking at 3 or if we have traded down to no later than 8 and took JC, DS or JW

We could trade down to 8 and miss on Chase, Waddle and Smith which then brings Pitts into play for me.

Would love to get Sewell Waddle, Sewell Pitts or Sewell Parsons.

Basically I want Sewell at 3 lol but I respect a trade down.
 
Love how player "A" can not be selected in a certain round because this pro-bowler was selected in a later round argument! I would actually understand it if we were talking about a Kicker, Punter, Long Snapper or a place holder. With this theory no QB should ever be selected before the 5th round I guess.
There are 10'000 ways we can go in this draft and it will improve this team a lot, I love the direction this team is heading and can't wait for FA to start. Go Phins!!!!
 
dolphinheel said:
Keep in mind Travis Kelce, a generational TE and perhaps the greatest TE of all time, was taken in the 3rd round. We will not be taking Pitts at #3, not because he isn’t a good player, but because he’s not a position of need. He’s a luxury pick. We already have a top ten TE. If we trade down even a few spots I still don’t see us taking a TE that early. We desperately need WRs, LB, DE, S, OC and a RB before we go TE. Some of these spots will be filled thru FA, most likely OC and DE/LB, and that will show us what direction the draft will look like. JMHO
Click to expand...

not taking Pitts at #3 because of positional value i agree with. not taking Pitts because we have Gesicki i don't.
 
Kyndig said:
Not sure about a linebacker at pick 36 but picking up at least and extra 2 this year and getting Pitts somewhere in a trade back in the top 10
Would be a nice move. I think Pitts would be a great selection.
Click to expand...
He's really growing on me. I've been going back and watching a few games and highlights and he's legit...
 
I’ve yet to see a first round tight end live up to the hype.
 
Beach Bum 91 said:
I agree. It's great just to discuss it.
As for Pitts, I like him and have advocated taking him at #3 (if we have a plan and like a guy, then we get him). My thought process was to pair him with Gesicki. However, I like Smith also. Let's say that both Pitts and Smith become pro-bowl players. My question is, who will help Tua and our team more?
Click to expand...
Pitts is a matchup nightmare, I think he opens up the O and changes the way opposing D's have to plan for him. He will draw attention away from most WR's and will have to be accounted for on the field. I think he'd be the bigger impact.
 
Kyndig said:
Why? Two tight ends with great receiving skills would be unstoppable.
Remember Gronk and Hernandez before all of the murder?
Click to expand...
It’s fine if you have 2 tight ends as long as one is an inline TE who can block in the run game, and one that’s basically a big slot/seam buster. Pitts and Gesicki are both slot receivers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom