flintsilver7
Sack Monster
I don't understand why McIntosh will likely be disrespected for a second straight year. The guy has been healthy for two years and has been actually quite good at left tackle for two years. He's been pretty consistent in run blocking and pretty consistent at pass protection. He's not Orlando Pace, but he was worlds better than high-priced free agent L.J. Shelton.
Last year, we were lucky to get McIntosh back. This year, I'm not sure we will be so lucky. It just seems like he is consistently undervalued by the staff when he has been pretty reliable. I would love to see what a healthy Culpepper can do behind a line that blocks - Culpepper certainly holds on to the ball too long, but he also had an ineffective line - Shelton was playing poorly and Bennie Anderson was playing period, making things worse.
I'd also like to keep McKinney, as he improved substantially in 2005 and would've been a 16-game starter had be been healthy last year. He's not as important as McIntosh, though, since we don't seem to have a reliable replacement for him.
Last year, we were lucky to get McIntosh back. This year, I'm not sure we will be so lucky. It just seems like he is consistently undervalued by the staff when he has been pretty reliable. I would love to see what a healthy Culpepper can do behind a line that blocks - Culpepper certainly holds on to the ball too long, but he also had an ineffective line - Shelton was playing poorly and Bennie Anderson was playing period, making things worse.
I'd also like to keep McKinney, as he improved substantially in 2005 and would've been a 16-game starter had be been healthy last year. He's not as important as McIntosh, though, since we don't seem to have a reliable replacement for him.