MERGED: Click for Cans | Page 60 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

MERGED: Click for Cans

i am very sad because now we dont have the mic award and we were winning this since this ballot began i know this is going to be very difficult but lets vote again like we voted
 
This has to be a mistake....we went from 31st last year to 6th this year....Pittsburgh was 6th and is now 2nd...they moved up 4 spots while we moved up 25 spots. Same with Green Bay. If they mean most improved by change in rank we still hould have the MIC. :confused: :mad:
 
Roman529 said:
This has to be a mistake....we went from 31st last year to 6th this year....Pittsburgh was 6th and is now 2nd...they moved up 4 spots while we moved up 25 spots. Same with Green Bay. If they mean most improved by change in rank we still hould have the MIC. :confused: :mad:[/...QUOTE]

I might be incorrect, but I think it is by number of clicks this year compared to last. Last years place vs this years doesnt matter... I think.....
 
Hornswaggled?

:yell:
Looking at all the reference material below, the MIC should've moved off of us MUCH earlier if it was based on total clicks and not change in overall position. WE improved by about 34 or 35,000 clicks from 2004. Pittsburgh improved by almost 190,000. When they hit 80,000 votes, they should've had the MIC credited to them at that point since they were more than 35,000 votes ahead of last year. If they had, we wouldn't of had that false sense of security regarding the MIC. I'm a little irritated at that because the results seem to have been "adjusted" at the last minute.

First are the 2005 results from
http://www.chunky.com/clickforcansvote.aspx?showresults=1

Final Rank Total Votes 2004 Rank
Green Bay Packers 269,556 1
Pittsburgh Steelers
clear.gif
238,484 6
Jacksonville Jaguars 74,625 3
Philadelphia Eagles 65,006 2
Cincinnati Bengals 44,413 9
Miami Dolphins 39,078 31
Washington Redskins 36,942 20
Indianapolis Colts 30,608 4
Houston Texans 29,123 7
Buffalo Bills 19,398 24
Baltimore Ravens 18,396 17
Minnesota Vikings 17,276 8
Oakland Raiders 14,421 25
Kansas City Chiefs 12,883 11
Cleveland Browns 9,441 10
New Orleans Saints 8,343 30
Carolina Panthers 8,261 5
Detroit Lions 7,898 22
Denver Broncos 7,366 18
Chicago Bears 7,003 15
Dallas Cowboys 6,601 16
Tennessee Titans 5,954 14
Atlanta Falcons 5,907 29
New England Patriots 5,625 13
Seattle Seahawks 5,509 19
St. Louis Rams 5,319 12
New York Jets 4,015 32
New York Giants 3,829 21
San Francisco 49ers 3,642 27
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 3,397 26
Arizona Cardinals 2,900 23
San Diego Chargers 2,883 28

http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2004/11/12/2/
"...With over 155,000 clicks registered, the Packers far outpaced the second-place team, the Philadelphia Eagles, who registered more than 110,000.

It's the third year in a row the Packers have captured the 'Click for Cans' contest. ..."

2004 results from another forum. These matched up in a couple other forums so I'm only posting this one.

http://www.hailredskins.com/vbforum/archive/index.php/t-17613

"hockeygoalie29
11-12-2004, 04:01 PM
Looks like it's over, I tried to vote today but was sent to the results page. Skins finished in 20th with 882.


Results:
Green Bay Packers 155,125
Philadelphia Eagles 110,875
Jacksonville Jaguars 61,251
Indianapolis Colts 56,225
Carolina Panthers 55,587
Pittsburgh Steelers 44,139
Houston Texans 39,028
Minnesota Vikings 27,232
Cincinnati Bengals 26,432
Cleveland Browns 19,131
Kansas City Chiefs 18,386
St. Louis Rams 16,396
New England Patriots 15,473
Tennessee Titans 13,399
Chicago Bears 11,786
Dallas Cowboys 10,742
Baltimore Ravens 8,756
Denver Broncos 8,683
Seattle Seahawks 8,334
Washington Redskins 8,082
New York Giants 7,308
Detroit Lions 7,068
Arizona Cardinals 6,962
Buffalo Bills 6,288
Oakland Raiders 6,225
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 6,145
San Francisco 49ers 5,795
San Diego Chargers 5,210
Atlanta Falcons 4,577
New Orleans Saints 4,008
Miami Dolphins 3,903
New York Jets 3,875
Total Votes:782,426 ..."

================

Not sure how valid the below link is, but after reading it I'm a little concerned.
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/charity/campbells.asp

If they're just donating returns, well...they should be doing that anyway.

OK...all that above said, I hope they do donate all those cans to help the needy. We also now have a reference to work off of for next year (this thread) if we want to really work this.
 
I think this about to start up again. So, we should start voting if we want to have a chance against the voting machines.
 
Back
Top Bottom