Merged: Dolphins Looking to Restructure JT! | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Merged: Dolphins Looking to Restructure JT!

FinAtic8480

FinAtic8480

Active Roster
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
14,810
Reaction score
66
Age
39
Location
Miami
Dolphins | Taylor could have contract restructured
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:19:16 -0800
Jason Cole, of the Miami Herald, reports the Miami Dolphins have had discussions about reworking DE Jason Taylor's contract. Taylor will count $11 million against the 2006 salary cap, with $8 million being a combination of base salary and roster bonus.
 
FinAtic8480 said:
Dolphins | Taylor could have contract restructured
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:19:16 -0800
Jason Cole, of the Miami Herald, reports the Miami Dolphins have had discussions about reworking DE Jason Taylor's contract. Taylor will count $11 million against the 2006 salary cap, with $8 million being a combination of base salary and roster bonus.
Click to expand...

He should do it. He's a team first kinda guy. He'll do it for the team and for the fans. He definately deserves to finish his career in Miami.
 
So if Zack and Jason do agree to restructure, do you all think maybe, just maybe, Sam will decide its an ok thing to do????
 
AllianceCollect said:
So if Zack and Jason do agree to restructure, do you all think maybe, just maybe, Sam will decide its an ok thing to do????
Click to expand...

He might, but is he really the type of player we need at corner in the hybrid scheme, especially, though I hate to say it because Sam is one of my favorites, that his play has been declining recently?
 
they are real team players.they really want to wiin a super bowl
 
RoninFin4 said:
He might, but is he really the type of player we need at corner in the hybrid scheme, especially, though I hate to say it because Sam is one of my favorites, that his play has been declining recently?
Click to expand...

You are right Sam doesnt even fit our schemes, I would really like a 4th rd for him.
 
I don't like the idea of restructuring Jason or Zach this year. When you restructure, all you're doing is pushing more dead cap into the future. We did such a good job managing the cap last year that we should be able to keep them at their current numbers this season.
 
dorsaroll156 said:
they are real team players.they really want to wiin a super bowl
Click to expand...

How does this make him a team player? I'm not saying he's not, he is....but this isn't really an example of it.

you do realize that when these players RESTRUCTURE. they are just getting more guaranteed money....which is a good thing for them. They are not taking PAY CUTS.

For all the crap that Sam Madison takes around here.....he is the only one of the three that I remember taking less money to help the team (in an attempt to leave money for them to resign Surtain). And then the team goes and trades Surtain anyway.......meaning Sam left money on the table for nothing.

Anyway, none of this restructuring will take place if they don't get a new CBA in place soon.
 
i garentee that they wouldnt reconstruct if wanny was still our coach theyre doin it cuz they know that were goin far with this roster and coachin staff
 
Gus needs to restrucutre. no way we should have a 4 million dollar cap hit on a sucky QB.
 
EBMisfit said:
Player Salary Salary (Cap) Amoritized Bonuses
Frerotte $4,100,000 $4,100,000 $250,000
Other Bonuses Cap Hit Estimated Cap Savings
$330,000 $4,680,000 $4,430,000
2000 Dead Cap Signed Thru
$250,000 2006
Click to expand...
thanks for backing me up.


you lose adamfirst. maybe you should look up **** before posting that stupid face.
 
death7star said:
thanks for backing me up.


you lose adamfirst. maybe you should look up **** before posting that stupid face.
Click to expand...


He didnt say you were wrong

ever think maybe he just was like 'damn 4 million dollars thats way to much'

and put the face, reading all your posts you REALLY need to stop thinking you are better than everyone, thats not bashing you thats just my opinion

That said 4 mil is way to much
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom