I don't watch enough college football to question whether we could have picked a receiver better than Hartline (or any player for that matter). This I think is the 1st pick that I am completely confused about. I knew we could stand to upgrade our WR corp. They're a good group of players, not great, but good and they proved reliable targets for Pennington last season. I figured when we selected Turner that we were going for Wilford's replacement and that Pat White would play a few snaps at WR as well to add more playmaking ability to that group. Assuming Wilford would soon be traded or released, I thought heading into the season with Ginn, Camarillo, Bess, London, Turner, and White (in situational duties) as our wide receivers would be a really good group to work with. Having so many other needs on the board, I can't help but question the logic of this pick. Nothing against Hartline, but I think we now have greater needs than wide receiver. Hopefully I'm wrong and the Trifecta made a good call here.
