Matt Flynn is not the answer. I would much rather go with Moore, who has more success as an NFL quarterback. Flynn is overglorified and it would be a mistake to get him instead of Manning or RGIII. If we do not sign Manning our main objective should be drafting Griffin.
If all else fails, I wouldn't be upset with having Matt Moore and a quarterback like Tannehill.
Matt Flynn is not the answer. I would much rather go with Moore, who has more success as an NFL quarterback. Flynn is overglorified and it would be a mistake to get him instead of Manning or RGIII. If we do not sign Manning our main objective should be drafting Griffin.
It's realy funny how folks sit here and say Flynn is not the answer for this reason or that. Why?? Our head coach has coached him his whole NFL career. He has groomed him from day 1. Now that doesn't mean he is ready but why do folks on here even attempt to say whether he is the answer or not. NOBODY knows the answer better than our own coach. So whether we get him or not will be determined by the absolute best person possible to make that decision. So folks should sit back and relax because our decision with Flynn will be based on experience with him up close and personal. To suggest we get a college QB with no experience and give up 2 drafts worth of picks is sort of ridiculous with the record we had last year. We need play makers on both sides and we need to find them in the draft.
It's Manning or Flynn and draft a develop guy in the 3rd or 4th. Seems like a no brainer.
It's realy funny how folks sit here and say Flynn is not the answer for this reason or that. Why?? Our head coach has coached him his whole NFL career. He has groomed him from day 1. Now that doesn't mean he is ready but why do folks on here even attempt to say whether he is the answer or not. NOBODY knows the answer better than our own coach. So whether we get him or not will be determined by the absolute best person possible to make that decision. So folks should sit back and relax because our decision with Flynn will be based on experience with him up close and personal. To suggest we get a college QB with no experience and give up 2 drafts worth of picks is sort of ridiculous with the record we had last year. We need play makers on both sides and we need to find them in the draft.
It's Manning or Flynn and draft a develop guy in the 3rd or 4th. Seems like a no brainer.
I got a bad feeling that RGIII might be another Vince Young or Tebow. He is a Mike Vick-type QB but can he throw the ball like Vick or like Tebow/Pat White/Young???
Tannehill in my opinion would be the safer pick and he already knows the offensive scheme.
Throw like Pat White? Have you ever watched Griffin play?