What's the difference between an Over/Under LB?
Don't get him started
What's the difference between an Over/Under LB?
Don't get him started
What's the difference between an Over/Under LB?
Too much inexperience as he only played one year at DE after a transfer from TE. Inconsistent rusher with poor hand usage. Most of his production came vs TEs and RBs. Best bet is in a 3-4 or 4-3 Under Will until he develops as more of an edge defender and rusher at Sam. His athleticism warrants recognition but not nearly polished enough to spend a first on.
Don't get him started
Disagree wholeheartedly on the hand usage, inconsistency and production. Watch the Voch Lombardi YouTube on TJ Watt, you'll be impressed.
I was set on TJ Watt for us for about two weeks, then I watched the Voch YouTube yesterday and it cemented it for me. That man has tremendous upside as a pass rusher.
In a 4-3 Over (our scheme), the DL is shifted towards the offensive line strength and all of your LBs are off the ball and the outside backer positions are almost identical.
In a 4-3 Under, the DL is shifted towards the offensive line's weak side, the Sam is on or at the LOS over the TE, and the Will is positioned slightly more inside over the guard with more protection from the defensive line to try and keep him cleaner vs the run.
Malik Hooker is a special player, who is #1 on my top 5 at 22 in the other thread. I would seriously consider trading up for him if still available after the Colts pick at 15, but will be hesitant to give up our 2nd. Obi Melifonwu is an intriguing FS, as well. Nonetheless, he is no Malik Hooker.
I'll keep it simple.
---------- Post added at 09:29 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:28 PM ----------
Thanks but I prefer game tape in silence and making my own assessment as opposed to someone hand selecting plays with their commentary. I'll live and die on my own hill instead of riding the coattails of others.
I'm not nearly as adept at recognizing the allignments and they're responsibilities to not have commentary...So understand that I appreciate your opinion above my own, even if it's different.
I'm a bit of a purist myself, only my scouting level probably correlates to watching the radio with the sound off.
Don't get him started
Personally trading up is not an option. We need all Of our picks
Yeah, if Malik Hooker is dropping down the board and is available at #19 which is where Mayock predicts him, then you trade up and get him!!!