NYC#1finsfan
Active Roster
Has the Fins taking LB Tremaine Edmunds with Rosen still available at 11. So there.
Mike Mayock, The Draft Guru.........
- Thread starter NYC#1finsfan
- Start date
Highzenga
Club Member
I probably would too.
multistage
Club Member
Oh, I pray......
hoops
Tua time!
Might have to get the Good Times intro out of the moth balls if Edmunds AND Rosen both on the board.
Butterfrog 2.0
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2004
- Messages
- 5,514
- Reaction score
- 1,921
I don't think Edmunds lasts that long, but I'd take him over Rosen too. But I'd also take Smith, Fitzpatrick, or James over any of the QB's so...
Phinsguy
Active Roster
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2010
- Messages
- 2,326
- Reaction score
- 1,290
Miami couldn't win because QB play was erratic, time to prepare for that scenario, If the QB is there, that should be the pick.
You're right. The QB was definitely at fault for a shitty defense and disastrous offensive line.
Brady is allowed to get rattled because his OL is playing poor, but Tannehill has to go 40/40 for 9,102 yards and 86,956 TDs in a game with Dallas Thomas and Billy Turner on OL for him to become decent in some fans' eyes.
He should throw 80-yard bombs on 3-step drops with Calais Campbell diving at his knees. Anything else is simply pathetic.
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2016
- Messages
- 5,076
- Reaction score
- 9,657
Rosen won't play right away and when he does I am not sure he is an upgrade over Tannehill. Since all indications are that Tannehill is healthy and will return this year, IMO, it would be more prudent to draft BPA and take a QB on day 3. In this scenario, my pick would be Edmunds. If Rosen is there, and a team calls to trade up I might consider that if we can get an extra 2nd. and don't have to trade too far back.
P.S. The only QB that I see as an upgrade to Tannehill would be Mayfield. Jackson is intriguing in a trade down. He is dynamic and needs time to develop, but he may not be a fit for a team that must win-now. On-the-other hand, we all might find him exciting to watch (even Ross). I am definitely wishy-washy on Jackson.
P.S. The only QB that I see as an upgrade to Tannehill would be Mayfield. Jackson is intriguing in a trade down. He is dynamic and needs time to develop, but he may not be a fit for a team that must win-now. On-the-other hand, we all might find him exciting to watch (even Ross). I am definitely wishy-washy on Jackson.
Last edited:
finomenal
☠️ Banned ☠️
Michael Scott
Club Member
If he's right I order the jersey immediately. Dream pick.
DKphin
Active Roster
If he says it it has to be true.:thumbsup But in all seriousness, of all the commentators that speak of the draft, I probably respect him the most.
I’m fine with taking a QB.....as long as they can play linebacker!!!
