Mike Wallace's Career Deep Receiving Statistics: Tannehill vs. Roethlisberger | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Mike Wallace's Career Deep Receiving Statistics: Tannehill vs. Roethlisberger

S

Shouright

☠️ Banned ☠️
Joined
May 18, 2004
Messages
15,051
Reaction score
18
Age
52
Data taken from Pro Football Focus, for passes targeted 20 or more yards downfield, with normative data based on all NFL receivers in the following seasons who received at least 50% of their team's downfield targets:


SEASON
Total Targets
Downfield Targets
Downfield Receptions
Downfield Drops
Downfield Yards
Catchable
TDs
Downfield Target %
Downfield Drop Rate
Downfield Catch Rate
WALLACE 2013
137
36
6
2
261
8
1
26.3
25.0
16.7
LEAGUE AVERAGE
134.6
28.7
10.2
1.1
373.6
11.3
3.0
21.9
9.5
35.8
LEAGUE STANDARD DEVIATION
27.8
5.9
3.4
1.2
126.8
3.6
2.3
4.7
10.1
10.1
WALLACE PERCENTILE RANK
47.6
80.9
4.7
71.4
19.0
9.5
9.5
85.7
90.4
0.0
SEASON
Total Targets
Downfield Targets
Downfield Receptions
Downfield Drops
Downfield Yards
Catchable
TDs
Downfield Target %
Downfield Drop Rate
Downfield Catch Rate
WALLACE 2012
116
31
6
2
263
8
4
26.7
25
19.4
LEAGUE AVERAGE
131.0
30.5
10.6
1.9
372.2
12.5
2.9
24.1
15.5
34.4
LEAGUE STANDARD DEVIATION
32.3
7.5
4.4
1.3
140.6
4.5
1.5
6.6
11.9
11.3
WALLACE PERCENTILE RANK
25.0
60.0
5.0
40.0
30.0
10.0
70.0
75.0
70.0
5.0
SEASON
Total Targets
Downfield Targets
Downfield Receptions
Downfield Drops
Downfield Yards
Catchable
TDs
Downfield Target %
Downfield Drop Rate
Downfield Catch Rate
WALLACE 2011
113
24
10
1
478
11
5
21.2
9.09
41.7
LEAGUE AVERAGE
108.1
26.9
9.5
1.2
334.7
10.6
2.9
25.9
12.0
34.6
LEAGUE STANDARD DEVIATION
26.5
5.7
3.9
1.0
161.5
4.1
2.0
6.6
10.4
12.0
WALLACE PERCENTILE RANK
60.0
30.0
53.3
30.0
73.3
53.3
76.6
16.6
40.0
76.6
SEASON
Total Targets
Downfield Targets
Downfield Receptions
Downfield Drops
Downfield Yards
Catchable
TDs
Downfield Target %
Downfield Drop Rate
Downfield Catch Rate
WALLACE 2010
93
29
14
1
571
15
7
31.2
6.67
48.3
LEAGUE AVERAGE
110.2
27.9
10.0
1.7
355.5
11.7
3.7
26.2
14.6
36.2
LEAGUE STANDARD DEVIATION
28.4
5.7
2.8
1.0
121.1
2.9
1.7
5.4
8.6
9.4
WALLACE PERCENTILE RANK
32.0
68.0
96.0
8.0
96.0
80.0
96.0
80.0
12.0
92.0
SEASON
Total Targets
Downfield Targets
Downfield Receptions
Downfield Drops
Downfield Yards
Catchable
TDs
Downfield Target %
Downfield Drop Rate
Downfield Catch Rate
WALLACE 2009
71
27
12
2
453
14
6
38
14.29
44.4
LEAGUE AVERAGE
105.0
24.0
7.4
1.2
276.6
8.7
2.6
24.1
15.1
31.0
LEAGUE STANDARD DEVIATION
28.2
4.4
2.6
0.9
116.0
2.6
1.6
6.3
12.2
9.9
WALLACE PERCENTILE RANK
8.8
73.5
94.1
76.4
94.1
97.0
94.1
97.0
52.9
91.1
 
shouright, I think you should spread out this type of analysis. Seriously. There would be less animosity and skepticism on the board if there were a week or two in between threads. I know it takes time to research and once you have it there's relief and self satisfaction, and you want to stick it in print while it's fresh in your mind and you know what you want to say in response. I've been there. I used to dump things on Las Vegas radio, and also to guys I consult for betting purposes. But I quickly realized there were diminishing returns. They have barely digested the previous thread and now there's a new one. It can read like piling on, especially in this case when virtually everything is Tannehill related, with great sensitivity here.

Besides, when threads like this are stacked in a short period of time, it allows certain posters to laughably exaggerate. They have no shame in announcing that some posters are insisting that Tannehill is awful, or Andy Dalton is great. The theme in general feeds into their victim role so they have no problem playing it to the hilt.

BTW, yesterday I had some great comebacks in matchup wagers in the Humana tournament on the PGA tour. I suppose I should head to the major golf sites and chide the guys who insist that driving distance doesn't matter. That type is in abundance, no different than the YPA doubters here. My golf matchup betting is based on putting stats and driving distance stats. It's unbelievable how many recreational golfers on those sites want to believe the nonsense that distance doesn't matter, just because they don't hit the ball a long way themselves, or some uninformed announcer(s) made it a theme. The golf media in total isn't any more sophisticated toward the most vital categories than the football media.
 
The thing with Wallace in Pittsburgh vs Miami is in Pittsburgh plays would break down and Roethlisberger we keep plays alive by scrambling where in Miami coach wants Tannehill to have the ball come out on time or he ends up being sacked. When Roethlisberger scrambles and keeps plays going on, corners aren't able to cover that long and Roethlisberger and Wallace were just on the same page. I literally believe most all of our teams problems are on philosophy and coaching.
 
Yeah. The coach's hand cuffed RT. Let the kid be a Football player. He has size,speed,and a arm. I feel that the deep ball will come. The Schemes Sherman ran were lacking for RT.
 
Looks like Wallace's production has been steadily dropping. 2013 is nearly identical to 2012. Interesting indeed.
 
His stats shouldn't of dropped this year he was missed for about 8-10 TDs this year.

Samsung Galaxy S III
 
How Shou keeps track of time...

550geekclock-1.jpg


:chuckle:
 
Morey161 said:
Don't care....his stats this year should of been way better. Tannehill missed him on a ton of balls.

Galaxy Note 10.1
Click to expand...

And how do you know that wasn't also the case in Pitt in 2012? Did you watch every Steelers game to know that Big Ben didn't also under/over throw him that year too?
 
FinfanInBuffalo said:
All QBs miss deep throws. The numbers show that. Pretending that only Tannehill does isn't logical.
Click to expand...

Pretending that he didnt miss more than most isn't logical. I like Tannehill and think hec will be very good and it will be fixed. But Wallace did what we paid him to do Tannehill just missed him.

Galaxy Note 10.1
 
Morey161 said:
Pretending that he didnt miss more than most isn't logical. I like Tannehill and think hec will be very good and it will be fixed. But Wallace did what we paid him to do Tannehill just missed him.

Galaxy Note 10.1
Click to expand...

Then why didn't the numbers decrease from last season?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom