ANUFan
Club Member
As many of you know our 1st couple of games features a slew of Mobile QB's(Tyroid, Mariota, Bortles etc). Historically, it seems and I haven't done the research, that from the eye-ball test we've typically struggle with those types of QB's.
I have no doubt that our defense, at least the front 4, has improved and how they've improved is what concerns me. We now have the ability to collapse the interior of an O-line, where immobile-like QBs thrive and are going to be in trouble. But, IMO, we more often than not expose our edges where mobile QBs tend to thrive.
Typically I would guess if you have great DE's that play the edge well, containment and all then you minimize exploitation. However, I personally rate OV a little better at this than Wake and rate them both as slight below to average when it comes to setting the edge. Particularly when they are in full Pass Rush, collapse the pocket mode.
The BIGGEST problem I think is with our LBs. Can they be discipline and smart enough to know where the natural "GAPS" created by our DLINE will be and fill them?
Thoughts?
I have no doubt that our defense, at least the front 4, has improved and how they've improved is what concerns me. We now have the ability to collapse the interior of an O-line, where immobile-like QBs thrive and are going to be in trouble. But, IMO, we more often than not expose our edges where mobile QBs tend to thrive.
Typically I would guess if you have great DE's that play the edge well, containment and all then you minimize exploitation. However, I personally rate OV a little better at this than Wake and rate them both as slight below to average when it comes to setting the edge. Particularly when they are in full Pass Rush, collapse the pocket mode.
The BIGGEST problem I think is with our LBs. Can they be discipline and smart enough to know where the natural "GAPS" created by our DLINE will be and fill them?
Thoughts?